Skip to main content

View Post [edit]

Poster: Roland Deschain Date: Aug 30, 2003 3:22pm
Forum: prelinger Subject: Review ordering

Just a minor gripe - as a hobby a couple weeks ago I started reviewing stuff in the need meta catagory (like spuzz and others) that previously have no reviews/meta etc. I was a little disappointed when more recent reviews actually go ahead of the older ones. I'm sure though there's a reason for it and that it's a coding thing that couldn't be changed easily anyway. I just thought that it takes away some of the credit from going out there and trying these untested films. I welcome any feedback =P
This post was modified by Roland Deschain on 2003-08-30 22:22:41

Reply [edit]

Poster: Steve Nordby Date: Sep 3, 2003 2:12pm
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: Review ordering

Interesting to note that new reviews of films that already have already been reviewed a few times (how many?) do not appear on the "Recently Updated Review" list.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Jonathan Aizen Date: Sep 3, 2003 2:59pm
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: Review ordering

This is a known bug... sorry about that.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Steve Nordby Date: Aug 31, 2003 11:06am
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: Review ordering

Hey, they have to go in *some* order... newest/oldest, highest/lowest rating, number of reviews by the reviewer, alphabetical order of the reviewer's name... besides if you revise your review, I think it goes back to the top, so you can practice revisionist history and always appear trendy!

Reply [edit]

Poster: Jonathan Aizen Date: Aug 31, 2003 12:11pm
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: Review ordering

the point is to show people the most recent reviews. that way if you come to the details page again, it shows you something new.

Reply [edit]

Poster: Roland Deschain Date: Aug 31, 2003 4:31pm
Forum: prelinger Subject: Re: Review ordering

Both good points - at the end of the day the movie is reviewed for people, so that's the important thing =)