|Home||American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections|
|Anonymous User (login or join us)|
Subject: "phred09"'s comment is refuted in the essay above
"phred09" libeled me and accused me of "anti-Semitism". This is ridiculous. To draw an analogy - if somebody dislikes Christianity and the fact that white Settlers in America exterminated Native Americans, or the fact that European settlers subjugated Africans, does that make them an anti-white bigot? Of course not. I AM NOT condemning people based on what family they were born in. I am condemning them for using the mask of Judaism as a basis for extremely pathological behavior. What we are dealing with has nothing to do with "race" and everything to do with the impact of psychopathy on society. Psychopathy permeates the modern world, but it is highly concentrated among the leaders of the movements examined in this essay, who are able to create a mythology about a purported "victimhood", so that when a critic brings up troubling items, he is immediately silenced. When one looks into this, one finds that there are rules of discourse for one who wants to get his message across, that avenues of "free expression" are not as free as one might think.
There are other reasons for this mythological narrative of "victimhood". One is that it allows for the "lesser brethren" to be kept in line. Another is that it ensures no real response when the leaders of these movements commit crimes against humanity.
Now, obviously it is fallacious to exclusively focus on one group of people. Violence is permeated across society. So it seems important, ultimately, to go beyond fixating on a particular group of people and consider the various destructive elements in our society today as techniques by which psychopaths achieve power. So for instance, the parasitic financial system, where money is created by loans as debts, could be considered a techniques whereby those who wish to express their violence via parasitism may achieve power (by rising to the top of the Usurocracy - with usury being the antisocial use of the monetary system in order to acquire further domination over society). Clubs (like Masonry) and Secret Societies with blood oaths could be considered to be techniques to achieve power over subordinate members, to dominate them, and to network with them to dominate those outside of the group. Religious Fraternities (like Judaism as mentioned, Catholicism, etc.), could be considered techniques to dominate adherents and cause harm to society, etc.
With that said, tremendous evil comes from what could be called "Jewish Politics". Leaders of it have extreme power in the modern world and have boasted about and acted upon their intentions. To note this is not to make a blanket condemnation of Jews, and even within the upper eschelons of the Zionist movement there are many people who have stood up against this destructive activity - for instance, Benjamin Freedman spent his energies trying to bring down the Zionist Movement; the Jewish scholar Israel Shahak has also spent energy attempting to halt Zionist excesses, and has written a cogent critique of Judaism entitled "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years": http://archive.org/details/JewishHistoryJewishReligionTheWeightOf3000Years; Gilad Atzmon has also spent his energies trying to curtail the hatred and bigotry in this tradition - my correspondent Jan Irvin has a couple of relevant interviews on this subject: http://www.gnosticmedia.com/gilad-atzmon-interview-zionism-and-jewish-identity-politics-pt-1-142/, http://www.gnosticmedia.com/GiladAtzmon_pt2_143
Dr. Oscar Levy is another Jewish scholar who deserves immense praise, who dissociated himself from these destructive activities, and who stated, in the prefatory letter to "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution" by George Pitt-Rivers:
"We have erred, my friend, we have most grievously erred. ... We who have posed as the saviours of the world, we who have even boasted of having given it "the" Saviour, we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. ... We who have promised to lead you to a new Heaven, we have finally succeeded in landing you in a new Hell. ... And yet we are not all Financiers, we are not all Bolshevists, we have not all become Zionists. ... our last word is not yet spoken, our last deed is not yet done, our last revolution is not yet made. This last Revolution, the Revolution that will crown our revolutionaries, will be the revolution against the revolutionaries. ... when the values of death and decay are put into the melting pot to be changed into those of power and beauty, then you, my dear Pitt-Rivers, the descendant of an old and distinguished Gentile family, may be assured to find by your side, and as your faithful ally, at least one member of that Jewish Race, which has fought with such fatal success upon all the spiritual battlefields of Europe." (pp. x-xi, xiii): http://ia600603.us.archive.org/22/items/TheWorldSignificanceOfTheRussianRevolution/48920297-Rivers-The-World-Significance-of-the-Russian-Revolution.pdf
And many Jews really do believe that their people are "victims", and are completely unaware of the atrocities comitted in their name - thus they are dupes and cannon fodder, manipulated in the same way the Levites and Pharisees manipulated their "flocks" in previous times. But this does not stop the fact that many are corrupt or willingly give consent to the actions of their leaders.
The fact is that the Jewish religion is a Satanic cult that views all people outside of the religion as subhuman. Bolshevism was the greatest system of Slavery and genocide we have yet encountered, committed by people who identified as Jewish chauvinists, even though they were of a more secular, neo-messianic bent. This fact is intentionally obfuscated, the Communists changed their names, and hid the percentage of Jews in the regimes, as well as the atrocities they committed. Zionism is behind the World Wars, threatens the world with nuclear war, and the leaders of that movement have explicitly stated that their goal is world government. Rabbi Wolf Gunther Plaut even admitted that World Government is in the tradition of Judaism: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/05/world-government-is-in-tradition-of.html
This tradition, when taken literally, holds that others are subhuman, and worthy only of being killed or enslaved. Naturally, given that attitude, devout adherence to this religion leads to pathological behavior, behavior that is not worthy of being called “superior” and instead is worthy of being called parasitic, whether it manifests as genocide (against the Armenians: http://tinyurl.com/85lke7y, or Russians: http://tinyurl.com/87dy672, or Palestinians: http://tinyurl.com/y2fxw67), financial parasitism (contrary to myth Jews were not “forced” into usurious trades, prof. Werner Sombart, author of “The Jews and Modern Capitalism”, dispels this idea: http://tinyurl.com/7xjtgen), ideological subversion (http://tinyurl.com/6myblql), or organized crime (http://tinyurl.com/6twrxkq).
Now, of course this is obfuscated, and Judaism is presented as a "humanitarian" and "Universalist" religion. This is reasonable, since adherents of it might have difficulty accomplishing their objectives if it was widely known that they viewed others as subhuman, only worthy of being enslaved or killed. To illustrate this strategy of obfuscation, consider the way in which consider Sopherim 15, rule 10 - "even the best of the Gentiles should be killed" - is dealt with in the Jewish Encyclopedia. The Jewish Encyclopedia notes this verse, but attempts to dismiss the Rabbi who said this as fringe. It says, in it's entry under "Gentile": http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6585-gentile#anchor7
"Simon ben Yoḥai is preeminently the anti-Gentile teacher. In a collection of three sayings of his, beginning with the keyword (Yer. Ḳid. 66c; Massek. Soferim xv. 10; Mek., Beshal-laḥ, 27a; Tan., Wayera, ed. Buber, 20), is found the expression, often quoted by anti-Semites, "Ṭob shebe-goyyim harog" (="The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed"). This utterance has been felt by Jews to be due to an exaggerated antipathy on the part of a fanatic whose life experiences may furnish an explanation for his animosity; hence in the various versions the reading has been altered, "The best among the Egyptians" being generally substituted. In the connection in which it stands, the import of this observation is similar to that of the two others: "The most pious woman is addicted to sorcery"; "The best of snakes ought to have its head crushed" (comp. the saying, "Scratch a Russian and you will find a Tartar")."
So we can see an attempt to ignore the reality of extremist hate by cushioning it with hysteria over snakes and misogyny. At least we get an admission, however, that Jews censor the Talmud outside of their own circles.
Throughout the entry on "Gentile", we find irrelevant verses that are superseded by other verses.
This Rabbi was not a fringe character. In the entry under Lag B'omer, we find the following: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/11701-omer-lag-be
"Thirty-third day in the period of the counting of the 'omer ("Lag" = border="0">, the numerical value of which is 33), corresponding to the 18th day of Iyyar. This day is celebrated as a semi-holiday, although the reason for this celebration has not been detinitely ascertained. The reason most commonly given is that the plague which raged among the disciples of R. Akiba during the period of the 'omer (Yeb. 62b) ceased on that day(Shulḥan 'Aruk, Oraḥ Ḥayyim, 493, 2). The day is therefore known as the "Scholars' Festival," when the baḥurim indulged in various kinds of amusement and merrymaking. There is, however, no foundation in the Talmud for this tradition, unless, as was suggested, the text be changed to read "from Passover to the middle ["peras"] of 'Aẓeret" (Heilprin, "Seder ha-Dorot," vol. ii., s.v. "Akiba," § 4; Jacob Mölln, "Sefer ha-Maharil," § 54, Sabbionetta, 1556; comp. "Bet Yosef" and "Darke Mosheh" to Ṭur Oraḥ Ḥayyim, 493). But even then casuistic methods have to be employed to make the incident fit the day in question. Another reason given is that the manna first descended on this day ("Ḥatam Sofer," on Shulḥan 'Aruk, Yoreh De'ah, 233). For the reasons suggested in more modern times see 'Omer.
(see image) Lag be-'Omer.(From an old print.)
The cabalists attach a peculiar importance to Lag be-'Omer. It is a tradition with them that Simeon ben Yoḥai, the alleged author of the Zohar, died on that day, and at his death revealed to his pupils many secrets which were subsequently incorporated into the Zohar. The day is therefore called "Hillula de-Rabbi Simeon ben Yoḥai" (Zohar, ed. Amsterdam, 1685, p. 291b). The term "Hillula" (= "wedding ") points to the harmonious union of all the worlds that was effected at the death of that great rabbi. The day is celebrated with illuminations, because, according to the narrative, at the death of R. Simeon the world was filled with light, since the revelations which he had received were then put in writing in the Zohar (see Zohar, l.c. and p. 296b). A hymn entitled "Bar Yoḥai," which consists of ten stanzas, each stanza corresponding to one of the ten sefirot, is sung in many communities on that day. School-children are given bows and arrows, for, according to tradition, the rainbow did not appear during the life of R. Simeon; hence the children playing with bows symbolize the death of the sage. Another interpretation is given of this custom, in accordance with a saying in the Zohar that a bow of many colors will appear in the sky immediately before the coming of the Messiah. The bow with which the children play on that day thus symbolizes the prayer of the Jews that the promised bow shall appear."
So he was one of the most important Rabbis in all of Judaism!
To illustrate how different this ideology is from what is commonly believed, note the following from top Rabbis, as reported by the Israeli press:
“Gentiles exist to serve Jews”: http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=191782
“Gentile Sperm Leads to Barbaric Offspring”: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4006385,00.html
“Israeli Rabbi Preaches `Slaughter’ of Gentile Babies”: http://www.jkcook.net/Articles3/0511.htm
“Farmer: Settlers burned my sheep alive” (discusses Israeli settlers terrorizing Palestinians for sport):
“Poll: 55% back rabbis’ anti-Arab ruling”: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3998010,00.html
“Top rabbis move to forbid renting homes to Arabs, say ‘racism originated in the Torah’”: http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/top-rabbis-move-to-forbid-renting-homes-to-arabs-say-racism-originated-in-the-torah-1.329327
“Prohibition ‘Thou Shalt Not Murder’ applies only ‘to a Jew who kills a Jew,’ write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur.”: http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/news/the-king-s-torah-a-rabbinic-text-or-a-call-to-terror-1.261930
“Jews Consider Hate a Virtue”: http://www.netivyah.org/articles/The_Virtue_of_Hate.pdf
“Chabad Rabbi – Jews should kill Arab men, women, and Children during war”:
“Israeli Rabbis defend book’s religious defence of killing non-Jews”:
“Israeli Rabbis call for extermination camps for Palestinians”:
“Graveside party celebrates Hebron massacre”:
-In this short clip a group of Israeli Jews scurry to the nearest hilltop to catch a glimpse of the Gaza slaughter by the Israeli army. One Jewish women calls for Gaza to be “taken off the ground”:
-Here is a video of the most repulsive, hateful comments being given by Jews, saying (when describing Arab neighbors), that the extent of the fence around his house was the distance that a bullet fired from an M-16 could travel:
-Here is Morgan Spurlock assaulted by Rabbis merely for being in Israel and not being Jewish!:
With that said, although there has been havoc from this group, there has likewise been a coverup of that fact. This has occurred not only through Zionism and Bolshevism and financial imperialism, but also in other areas – like slavery. Given that Jews believe that Gentiles should be enslaved to them, it is unsurprising that they were the leaders of the slave trade. The Jewish historian Jacob Marcus noted in “The Encyclopedia Britannica”: “In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in Jewish hands, in particular the slave trade.” (http://tinyurl.com/7dbbr4j)
In “A History of the Jews: From Babylonian Exile to the End of World War II”, published by the Jewish Publication Society of America, the author, Solomon Grayzel, notes that “Jews were among the most important slave dealers [in European Society]” (http://tinyurl.com/7wev3cp)
In “Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History”, Front Cover, Marc Lee Raphael noted that this was not just confined to Europe, but also extended to the Americas. He stated: “Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.” (http://tinyurl.com/7m8jhul)
He continued: “This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the ‘triangular trade’ that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760s and early 1770s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent.” (http://tinyurl.com/74rwcfr)
In “New World Jewry, 1493-1825″, Seymour B. Liebman noted: “They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale” (http://tinyurl.com/73ckmws)
He also noted that they “were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise” (http://tinyurl.com/827mq6l)
He furthermore noted that “The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.” (http://tinyurl.com/7eedw39)
Writing in “Jews in Colonial Brazil”, Arnold Wiznitzer noted that: “cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates” (http://tinyurl.com/83x87ek)
He further noted that: “If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644.” (http://tinyurl.com/78l223h)
In “United States Jewry, 1776-1985, Volume 1″, Jacob Marcus noted that “Very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds.” (http://tinyurl.com/72lrgor)
The Nation of Islam decided to do something about this, and invested in a massive research project that resulted in the text “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews”: http://www.blacksandjews.com/
It was condemned, of course, as “anti-Semitism” and “pseudo-history” by lobbies like the ADL, merely for repeating what had been established by Jewish historians! Dr. Tony Martin was one such historian, who describes his experiences after contributing to that field: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vKQ-J3jsrA
There was also (though it is not discussed today), significant White Slavery, as has been recorded in books like that of my former correspondent Michael Hoffman II in “They Were White and They Were Slaves”. This continues in modern times, and it is Jewish dominated. The New Orleans Times-Picayune on January 11, 1998, ran an article titled “Slave traders Lure Slavic Women”, which discussed a Ukranian woman who tried to escape poverty, found an offer for work in Israel, and wound up there as a sex slave. The article noted:
“She was 21, self-assured and glad to be out of Ukraine. Israel offered a new world, and for a week or two everything seemed possible. Then, one morning, she was driven to a brothel, where her boss burned her passport before her eyes.
“I own you,” she recalled his saying. “You are my property, and you will work until you earn your way out. Don’t try to leave. You have no papers and you don’t speak Hebrew. You will be arrested and deported. Then we will get you and bring you back.”" (http://tinyurl.com/79wm6d3)
The article went on to say:
“The women who work there, like nearly all prostitutes in Israel, are Russian, their boss is not.
“Israelis love Russian girls,” said Jacob Golan. … “They are blonde and good looking and different from us,” he said, chuckling.”
In the Jewish Magazine “Moment”, in an article entitled “Hookers in the Holy Land”, Samuel Katz noted that: “”The entire spectrum of Israeli society is keeping the hookers in business.” Claims Detective Shachar, a cynical veteran on the Tel Aviv vice detail … Once the girls arrive in Israel, the crime bosses take over. The girls are usually taken to an “auction house,” where the owners of the various massage parlors can bid on the talent — each one offers a price, and the highest bidder gets the girl. … The girls are virtual slaves.” (Katz, Samuel M. “Hookers in the Holy Land”. Moment. April, 1998. pp. 45-78)
Of course, all these transgressions are ignored, and we are perpetually reminded that Jews are “victims”. Arthur Topham of RadicalPress.com noted, when describing this tendency: “all of what the Zionist Jews write about others is actually but a reflection of their own inner, perverse, dislocated self. By projecting outward on to others their innate paranoid and deep-seated hatred for the rest of the world they’re able to meet the requirements of the Israeli state’s [actually Mossad's] motto which reads, “By Way of Deception Though Shalt Cause War” and feel a sense of superiority and self-righteousness in doing so.” (http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1313)
The Rothschild banking system is key in all of this. It was the principal subsidizer of both Communism and Zionism, so these movements could more accurately be called Rothschild Communism and Rothschild Zionism. Thus my article on the Rothschilds is of tremendous significance: http://archive.org/details/SummaryOfRothschildPower
Many people find it difficult to believe that a few people can control vast numbers of the population. But this makes sense when considering the underlying structure of financial parasitism at the root of our system, as I discuss in my article on the Rothschilds. Also, as noted in "Waters Flowing Eastward", the industrialist kingpin Walter Rathenau, in his article “Geschäftlicher Nachwuchs”, reprinted in p. 207 of Zur Kritik der Zeit (http://www.archive.org/stream/zurkritikderzeit00rathuoft#page/206/mode/2up) gave insight into the power elite, when he stated that "Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage." The meaning of this was clarified 22 years later in 1931 when Jean Izoulet, a prominent member of the Judeo-Masonic Alliance Israelite Universelle, wrote in his Paris la Capitale des Religions: "I will certainly not abandon their Magisterium time the three hundred bankers who now dominate the world." (a facsimile of the page this appears on is here: http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/2bd4912fa90e2155267b3fc182b5d7d5.jpg)
Rathenau is of particular significance. The text "Red Symphony" mentions him as having facilitated the Bolshevik ambition from within Germany. Benjamin Freedman called him "100 times more important than Bernard Baruch". In his book “In Days to Come”, Rathenau noted his principle role in the World Revolution when he said (p. 184), “For years I had foreseen the twilight of the nations that I had heralded in my speeches and writings.”: http://tinyurl.com/8xyjyhg
Elsewhere in the book (p. 29), he stated that “No part of the world is now closed to us. No Material tasks are beyond our powers. All the treasures of earth are within our grasp. No thought remains hidden. Every undertaking can be put to the task and realized. The fertilizing distribution of the possessions of the world is our task.”: http://tinyurl.com/82pwgwb
He stated that a goal of his was (p. 74) to “discover the force that will effect and up and down movement of the masses.”: http://tinyurl.com/6pj4233
After that statement, he pretends that he is all liberal and loving and good. Yet as Henry Ford noted, Rathenau was a principal architect of Lenin's system of destruction and enslavement: http://tinyurl.com/7rq5fom
In his book “The New Society”, Rathenau said that (p. 8) “A far reaching policy of socialization … is necessary and urgent”: http://tinyurl.com/7gkmfkq
He ends the book with the following statement:
“The goal of the world revolution upon which we have entered means in its material aspect the melting of all strata of society into one.” (p. 147): http://tinyurl.com/6ng3qb9
Bernard Baruch is also a special character. I discuss him in my article on the Rothschilds. Col. Curtis Dall also discusses his significance in “FDR: My Exploited Father In Law”. Dall, in that book, and Douglas Reed, in a chapter of “Far And Wide” entitled “Communism Penetrant”, also noted that FDR sacrificed American interests in favor of Globalism and what was at the time Communism. In that chapter, Reed showed how Roosevelt consciously worked to subvert Constitutional safeguards, helped further the aims of World Communism, and ultimately served higher circles. He asked, “What real purpose did Mr. Roosevelt promote through the way he used his imperial powers?”, and then noted:
“He furthered the main principles of a plan for the redistribution of the earth published in 1942 (but clearly prepared much earlier) by a mysterious `Group for a New World Order’, headed by a Mr. Moritz Gomberg. What this group proposed was startling at the time but proved farsighted. The main recommendations were that the Communist Empire should be extended from the Pacific to the Rhine, with China, Korea, Indo-China, Siam and Malaya in its orbit; and that a Hebrew State should be set up on the soil of `Palestine, Transjordan and the adjoining territories’. These two projects were largely realized. Canada and numerous `strategic islands’ were to pass to the United States (the reader should keep these `strategic islands’ in mind). The remaining countries of Western Europe were to disappear in a `United States of Europe’ (this scheme is being vigorously pursued at present). The African continent was to become a `Union of Republics’. The British Commonwealth was to be left much reduced, the Dutch West Indies joining Australia and New Zealand in it. The scheme looks like a blueprint of the second stage in a grand operation of three stages, and substantial parts of it were achieved; what was not then accomplished is being energetically attempted now.”
He subsequently cited Admiral William D. Leahy’s text “I was There” (1950) to argue that “Mr. Roosevelt’s grand design was for a large apportionment of the globe between the Communist Empire and the United States, at the expense of the British Commonwealth and French Empire. Support of Communism in China, too, was primarily intended to prevent a British revival there and in the planning of the Pacific campaign everything was done to exclude the British and make China and Japan into a Soviet-American sphere of influence.”: http://douglasreed.co.uk/far.pdf
It's interesting given all of this World Government and "New World Order" advocacy that Karl Marx actually coined the therm "New World Order" in the text “The Holy Family”, where he said: “The revolutionary movement which began in 1789 in the Cercle Social, which in the middle of its course had as its chief representatives Leclerc and Roux, and which finally with Babeuf’s conspiracy was temporarily defeated, gave rise to the communist idea which Babeuf’s friend Buonarroti re-introduced in France after the Revolution in 1830. This idea, consistently developed, is the idea of the new world order.”: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/holy-family/ch06_3_c.htm
Incidentally, Salluste cited on p. 574 of his article a letter from Baruch Levy to Karl Marx, which stated the following:
“The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.
In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”
I will direct the reader again to Billington's text "Fire in The Minds of Men", where he noted that Buonarroti, who facilitated the Monopoly Capitalist/Communist goal of the "New World Order", continued the Illuminist tradition. The Journalist Eugene H. Methvin, in his book, “Rise of Radicalism: The Social Psychology of Messianic Extremism”, noted how Buonarotti’s influence extended to Moses Hess, the mentor of Karl Marx, who was also a key founder of the Zionist movement (p. 151): “In October of 1842 Frederick Engels stopped in Cologne and spent an afternoon with Moses Hess, then 30, who was known as the ‘communist rabbi’ for his missionary zeal in proselytizing for French utopian ideas. Hess later wrote a friend, ‘Engels, an embryonic revolutionary, parted from me the most enthusiastic communist’. Engels himself credited his conversion to Dr. Hess, and a year later expressly declared that the latter was ‘the first to make communism plausible to me and my circle’. He goes on to say, ‘Marx and Engels planned to publish a German edition of Buonarroti’s Conspiration pour l’egalite (Conspiracy for Equality), translated by Moses Hess … Marx’s extensive collection of books on the French Revolution contained a copy of Buonarroti’s Conspiration’.”: http://tinyurl.com/7norp5t
From there, we have the admissions of Churchill and Trotsky establishing the continuation and prominence of this tradition. The text "Red Symphony" will fill in the blanks for the reader.
Now, just to clarify a few other things:
On the background of Bolshevism, many people think that Czarism was "terrible". A far different reality is given by Knuppfer, in his text "The Struggle For World Power".
There is more to the supposedly "unprovoked” "evil deeds" done against Jews in "pogroms" than meets the eye. The actual content of the Czar’s 1882 edict was as follows: “For some time the government has given its attention to the Jews and to their relations to the rest of the inhabitants of the empire, with a view of ascertaining the sad condition of the Christian inhabitants brought about by the conduct of Jews in business matters. … With few exceptions, they have as a body devoted their attention, not to enriching or benefiting the country, but to defrauding by their wiles its inhabitants, and particularly its poor inhabitants. This conduct of theirs has called forth protests on the part of the people, … thought it a matter of urgency and justice to adopt stringent measures in order to put an end to the oppression practiced by the Jews on the inhabitants, and to free the country from their malpractices, which were, as is known, the cause of the agitations.”: http://tinyurl.com/6tgx2pe
Likewise, subsequent anti-Jewish actions on the part of the Tsarist regime were taken only because of Jewish revolutionary subversion. When discussing the revolution of 1905, William Eleroy Curtis, before the National Geographic Society, stated the following:
“THE VENGEANCE OF THE JEWS
Perhaps these reforms are the cause of the present tranquility, because the revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund, which has its headquarters at Bialystok, where the massacre occurred last June. The government has suffered more from that race than from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is always done by a Jew, and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire Empire. The great strike which paralyzed the Empire and compelled the Czar to grant a constitution and a parliament was ordered and managed by a Jew named Krustaleff, president of the workingmen’s council, a young man only thirty years old. He was sent to the penitentiary for life, and had not been behind the bars more than three weeks when he organized and conducted a successful strike of the prison employees.
Maxim, who organized and conducted the revolution in the Baltic provinces, is a Jew of marvelous ability. Last fall he came over here lecturing and collecting money to carry on the revolutionary campaign, but for some reason has vanished and nobody seems to know what has become of him.
Gerschunin, the most resourceful leader of the terrorists, who was condemned to life imprisonment in the silver mines on the Mongolian frontier, has recently escaped in a water cask, and is supposed to be in San Francisco. He is a Polish Jew only twenty-seven years old. I might enumerate a hundred other revolutionary leaders and every one of them would be a Jew. Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of a bomb you will notice in the newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew. The most sensational and dramatic episode that has occurred since the mutinies was on October 27, when, in the very center of Saint Petersburg, at the entrance of Kazan Cathedral, four Jews held up a treasury wagon and captured $270,000. They passed the package to a woman, who instantly vanished, and no trace of her has ever been found; but they were all arrested and were promptly punished. On the 8th of November a few Jewish revolutionaries entered a treasury car near Ragow, in Poland, got $850,000 and disappeared.
Every deed of that kind is done by Jews, and the massacres that have shocked the universe, and occurred so frequently that the name ‘pogrom’ was invented to describe them, were organized and managed by the exasperated police authorities in retaliation for crimes committed by the Jewish revolutionists.” (W. E. Curtis, “The Revolution in Russia”, The National Geographic Magazine, Volume 18, Number 5, (May, 1907), pp. 313-314): http://tinyurl.com/3rx2ygp
The Tsarist government certainly had a lot to worry about since, as the 1905 Jewish encyclopedia admitted: “While in Germany socialism has attracted individual Jews, in Russia it has become a movement of the Jewish masses.”: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13822-socialism#anchor4
This movement was a twin brother of the Zionist movement. In fact, Chaim Weizmann, the founder of the State of Israel, illustrated how deep this connection was, quoting an oft-repeated saying of his mother, in his autobiography, "Trial and Error" (Harper, New York, 1949, p. 13):
“Whatever happens, I shall be well off. If Shemuel (the revolutionary son) is right, we shall all be happy in Russia; and if Chaim (the Zionist) is right, then I shall go to live in Palestine.”
Joseph Nedava, in "Trotsky and the Jews", published by the Jewish Publication Society, noted Trotsky's connection to Zionism, writing, "Trotsky must have followed very closely the Sixth Zionist Congress at Basle in 1903. Shortly after the close of the Second Social-Democratic Congress in London he arrived in Switzerland, at the very time when the Zionist Congress was taking place, in August. It should be noted that this congress marked the zenith of Dr. Herzl's activities, and the Zionist Organization was granted an international status following the diplomatic negotiations which had been carried on by the British government with its representatives. Preparations for convening the Zionist Congress were well publicized by the world press, and Trotsky was attracted - either on his own account or through his Bundist acquaintances - to attend its proceedings. He read the Zionist organ Die Welt, as well as the general press, which reflected the keen interest in the Zionist movement even among non-Zionist and non-Jewish circles." Nedava further established that Trotsky merely believed that it was practically inviable in comparison to Bolshevism: http://mailstar.net/nedava.html
Although Lenin made rhetorical statements against Zionism (as every intelligent conspirator knows, one must obfuscate things, hence, in 1903, he wrote, "this Zionist idea is absolutely false and essentially reactionary. ... Absolutely untenable scientifically, the idea that the Jews form a separate nation is reactionary politically. … That is precisely what the Jewish problem amounts to: assimilation or isolation?—and the idea of a Jewish “nationality” is definitely reactionary not only when expounded by its consistent advocates (the Zionists), but likewise on the lips of those who try to combine it with the ideas of Social-Democracy (the Bundists).": http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1903/oct/22a.htm - in a similar way, George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton issued forth rhetoric against drugs but were involved in drug smuggling: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJibpRgRaUg), he nevertheless conferred with and was on very good terms with the Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/when-bolshevism-meet-zionism.html
Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow, wrote in his 1919 book "History of Zionism" of how beneficial the October Revolution was for the Zionist movement: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/zionism-stimulated-by-russian.html
Trotsky, shortly after the October Revolution, noted the Jewish priority of the Bolsheveki, admitting that "The very first order of the Bolshevist government was that pogrom makers shall be shot down on the spot without trial." (included in his description of "pogrom makers" were shopkeepers and tradesmen): http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/jewish-priority-of-bolsheviki.html
According to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, on July 27, 1918, Lenin stated that Christian priests could be shot on sight, for "every priest was by law considered to be a pogromist": http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/3/Strauss342-351.html
Miss Anne Gray of Brooklyn, New York, returned to the United States in December 1923, having spent the two previous years working for the Near East Relief Orphanage in the Soviet Union.
She had the following to say:
"I returned home through northern Russia, and found conditions in Moscow and Petrograd very bad indeed. There are a few Russians with real brains left alive in the country whom the Jews who control Russia are starving to death. They do not wish the intelligent Russians to survive or to leave the country. Russians no longer control their own country: the Jewish Bolsheviki control it. Conditions grow steadily worse. The railroad from Tbilisi to Petrograd is lined with the ruins of the factories which were busy under the Czar; the freight cars and ruined engines rot beside the rails. The peasants are as ignorant as ever; and the intelligent class is being broken and starved, while the aristocrats have been murdered. No real Russians are to be found among the present dictators.": http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/07/1923-bolshevik-jews-eliminating.html
And I have mentioned before that I have some problems with Juri Lina, the creator of the film "In the Shadow of Hermes", which is attached, due to his tendency to combine high quality and low quality sources, and to make unsubstantiated claims. Nevertheless, he has done some good primary source research, and in his book "Under the Sign of the Scorpion", he provides an account of Soviet atrocities that is consistent with what I have provided, and relies on high quality sources:
"Lenin and his accomplices did not arrest just anyone. They executed those most active in society, the independent thinkers. Lenin gave orders to kill as many students as possible in several towns. The Chekists arrested every youth wearing a school cap. They were liquidated because Lenin believed the coming Russian intellectuals would be a threat to the Soviet regime. (Vladimir Soloukhin, "In the Light of Day", Moscow 1992, p. 40.)
The role of the Russian intellectuals in society was taken over by the Jews.
Many students (for example in Yaroslavl) learned quickly and hid their school caps. Afterwards, the Chekists stopped all suspect youths and searched their hair for the stripe of the school cap. If the stripe was found, the youth was killed on the spot.
The author Vladimir Soloukhin revealed that the Chekists were especially interested in handsome boys and pretty girls. These were the first to be killed. It was believed that there would be more intellectuals among attractive people. Attractive youths were therefore killed as a danger to society. No crime as terrible as this has hitherto been described in the history of the world.
The terror was co-ordinated by the Chekist functionary Joseph Unschlicht. How did they go about the murders? The Jewish Chekists flavoured murder with various torture methods. In his documentary "The Russia We Lost", the director Stanislav Govorukhin told how the priesthood in Kherson were crucified. The archbishop Andronnikov in Perm was tortured: his eyes were poked out, his ears and nose were cut off. In Kharkov the priest Dmitri was undressed. When he tried to make the sign of the cross, a Chekist cut off his right hand.
Several sources tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed the victims in a row and nailed their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a knife, poured boiling water over the hands and pulled the skin off. This was called "pulling off the glove". In other places, the victim’s head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed with a steam hammer. Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were forced to watch. The eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues were cut off and they were buried alive. There were Chekists who used to cut open the stomachs of their victims, following which they pulled out a length of the small intestine and nailed it to a telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim to run circles around the pole until the whole intestine had been unravelled and the victim died. The bishop of Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the monks, with revolvers aimed at their heads, were forced to drink this soup.
Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with special headscrews, or drilled them through with dental tools. The upper part of the skull was sawn off and the nearest in line was forced to eat the brain, following which the procedure would be repeated to the end of the line.
The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the children before the eyes of their parents, and the wives before their husbands. Mikhail Voslensky, a former Soviet functionary, described some of the cruel methods used by the Chekists in his book “Nomenklatura” / "Nomenclature" (Stockholm, 1982, p. 321): "In Kharkov, people were scalped. In Voronezh, the torture victims were placed in barrels into which nails were hammered so that they stuck out on the inside, upon which the barrels were set rolling. A pentacle (usually a five-pointed star formerly used in magic) was burned into the foreheads of the victims. In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin, the hands of victims were amputated with a saw. In Poltava and Kremenchug, the victims were impaled. In Odessa, they were roasted alive in ovens or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, the victims were placed in coffins with a decomposing body and buried alive, only to be dug up again after half an hour."
Lenin was dissatisfied with these reports and demanded: "Put more force into the terror!" All of this happened in the provinces. The reader can try to imagine how people were executed in Moscow. The Russian-Jewish newspaper Yevreyskaya Tribuna stated on the 24th of August 1922 that Lenin had asked the rabbis if they were satisfied with the particularly cruel executions.
The Russian people remember with horror their Jewish executioners, all of whom had their own methods for getting rid of their enemies. Ashikin in Simferopol made his victims march stark naked before him whereupon he hacked off their arms and ears with his sword before he personally pressed out their eyes and cut off their heads. The chief executioner in Nikolaiev, Bogbender, had his victims walled in alive. Deutsch and Wichman worked in Odessa. They claimed to have no appetite until they had killed several hundred goys. The Chekists in Voronezh committed ritual murders. Among other things, they used to boil their victims alive. That was a common method of getting rid of goys and Jewish renegades. Nearly all the inhabitants of Pyatigorsk were exterminated. All this information was published in the Russian newspaper Russkoye Vosskresenye, No. 3, 1991.
It is impossible, for lack of space, to describe all the butchers and their crimes. I shall just mention some numbers. During a single year in power, the Bolsheviks exterminated 320 000 clergymen (Molodaya Gvardiya, No. 6, 1989). A total of 10 180 000 “class enemies” were murdered between 1918 and 1920. Another 15 million people died during the civil war. During the famine of 1921-22, another 5 053 000 people perished. The Bolsheviks, headed by Lenin, managed to destroy over 30 million people during their first four years in power.
In 1917, 143.5 million people lived in the part of Imperial Russia, which later became Soviet Russia. Russia had lost more than 20 per cent of her population by 1922. Only 131 million lived there in 1923. It has been calculated that Russia’s population, under normal circumstances, should have increased to 343 million by the middle of the 1950s, that is, if the development had continued as it had begun in the Tsarist era. 165 million people disappeared. Who in the West mourns for them? There were 178 million left.
Kaganovich and his cronies brought about this genocide by the introduction of confiscatory taxation on those peasants who remained after the extermination of the “kulaks”. Meanwhile, he sent out new gangs of fanatical activists who commanded enforcement patrols, especially in the Ukraine, where the borders to the other Soviet republics had been closed off. The political activists took away every grain of corn and every egg, every vegetable and every fruit of the farms’ produce. Convoys of trucks carried all the food away. Each piece of bread, which should have been brought to the starving, was confiscated at the border. Every Ukrainian, who might be suspected of the least, often invented, attempt at lessening the full impact of the famine or of hiding foodstuffs from the authorities, was shot or sent to the labour camps. (Robert Conquest, "The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collektivization and the Terror-Famine", Alberta, 1986.)
Each morning, wagons drove about to collect the dead in the Ukraine and southern Russia. Bodies lined the roads in Central Asia too. Cannibalism became increasingly common in the Ukraine in 1934. Several sources show that the famine even brought forth actual slaughterhouses for orphaned children, whose meat was later sold.
The systematic killing of large numbers of children began as early as 1934. After all, they cost money… In Moscow, the murders were carried out in the prison dungeons of the Lubyanka, the Butyrka and the Lefortovo. Stalin and Kaganovich had their most famous victims cremated at night, following which they had the ash smuggled out and buried in a mass grave in the Donskoye graveyard. This seemed the safest way to complete the total elimination of their important victims.
Far from all of those killed in the jails of Moscow during the 1930s, the 1940s and the beginning of the 1950s were cremated. Most of them were thrown into various mass graves in Moscow. One of those hitherto unknown mass graves was found in the Kalitinsky graveyard in southern Moscow. The NKVD used it as a dumping site for bodies for several years in the 1930s.
The covered lorries arrived at around five in the afternoon, every single day for seven years between 1934 an 1941. They drove up to the far end of a ravine, turned around and reversed up to the edge. The trucks were painted blue-green and lacked side-windows. Instead, large letters on the sides of the truck announced SAUSAGES or MEAT and sometimes CAKES. When the truck had backed up to the edge and stopped, a hatch was opened at the back and two officers wearing NKVD uniforms, rubber boots, long rubber aprons in black and gold and elbow-length rubber gloves seized the corpses by the heads and legs and threw them down into the ravine. Two other soldiers waited down below with shovels and threw some earth on the bodies. The corpses were always naked. They all had bullet holes in their heads; a small entry hole in the back of the neck and large exit hole in front. They had been shot from behind. The executioners had an unlimited supply of alcohol. They were usually drunk, sometimes extremely.
The KGB admitted in July 1990 that there were also mass graves in the Donskoye and Vagankovskoye cemeteries in Moscow. A large execution site has now been found in Kuropaty, six miles from Minsk, the capital of Byelorussia. At least 102 000 people were murdered there, including many women. Witnesses have related that the executions began in the evenings and continued through the nights. The executioners wore NKVD uniforms. The witness Mikolai Karpovich saw how people stood lined up by a mass grave. They were gagged and blindfolded. To save bullets, the executioners usually tried to shoot two people with each shot. Executions took place there every day between 1937 and June 1941.
The people who lived near the Kuropaty forest could hear salvoes of shots and prisoners begging and screaming for their lives. There were at least five such execution sites around Minsk, where the butchers worked in shifts. Uniformed NKVD men used to take part in the dance in the village of Kuropaty at around 11 o’clock on Saturday evenings. (Expressen, 18th of October 1988.)
About fifty mass graves in this area have later been opened. Prisoners who were taken to Kuropaty in the winter were forced to step out of the carriages in the severe cold, whereupon they were showered in icy water and ordered to return to the carriages. Not many survived until the following morning. The heads were cut off from all the frozen corpses. The survivors were killed at the edge of the mass grave, into which all the victims were thrown.
Moscow Television related on the 12th of September 1989 that nearly 300 000 victims had been found in an abandoned goldmine near Chelyabinsk. This was the largest mass grave. The Communists killed up to 250 000 “enemies of the people” in the forest of Bykovnya near Kiev between 1937 and 1941. Most were shot in the neck, but a few had also been poisoned by smoke (Dagens Nyheter, 25th of March 1989). That place had earlier been called the grave of the victims of fascism. The bodies of many Jews were supposed to have been hidden there, but this lie was exposed after the fall of Communism.
From 1943, the Chekists managed to collect two million children per year. Beria became a dreadful executioner during the Second World War, since he was able to conceal his crimes as the work of the Nazis. He had nearly 20 million people captured and sent to slave camps. According to the latest estimates, the Soviet Union lost at least 32 million, possibly 45 million, citizens during the Second World War. The historian Nikolai Tolstoy claims that most of them (presumably 20 million) were killed by order of Lavrenti Beria. All those deaths were blamed on the Germans.
Stalin, Kaganovich and Beria had 25 700 Polish citizens executed in April 1940. The murder of more than 4000 Polish officers (including many of Jewish blood) in Katyn was brought to light by the Germans. It was Ivan Krivozhertsev who informed the Germans about the mass graves in the Katyn forest. No one wanted to listen to the Nazis’ claim that it had been the work of the Bolsheviks, since the Soviet Union had blamed the Germans.
It was only on the 14th of October 1992 that a copy of the decision signed by Stalin and passed by Molotov, Kaganovich, Kalinin and others, was handed over to the Polish President Lech Walesa by the Russian government. It was not really so strange that Jewish Chekists had also executed Jewish officers (including Abram Engel, Samuel Rosen, Isaak Gutman, Isaak Feinkel and others) who had served in the Polish army. After all, the Old Testament states that Yahweh is equally merciless against his own chosen people (Joshua 24:19). They were regarded as traitors!
The President of the United States of America Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and the British Prime Minister Anthony Eden, prohibited all publicity about this mass murder. Roosevelt officially asserted that the events in Katyn were a German plot. Winston Churchill warned his ministers: “The whole subject must be avoided!” At the same time, he assured Stalin that he would do all he could to silence the Polish exile newspapers in London.
Voice of America was not, even in the 1970s, allowed to relate that the Bolsheviks had killed the Polish officers. Hans Holzapfel, the Jewish chief of the European section, was responsible for the censorship.
It is now known exactly what happened. The mass murders began in April 1940. The Polish officers, wearing winter uniforms, were brought in small groups – 30-40 at a time – to the execution site. They were then shot in the neck, one at a time, whilst standing by the edge of the mass grave.
The NKVD continued working every day for nearly six weeks. A total of 4143 officer’s bodies were found. 4421 people were killed in the Katyn forest, according to the documents. All the identified bodies proved to be former prisoners from Kozielsk. The prisoners who had been incarcerated in the Starobielsk (near Kharkov) and Ostashkov (near Kalinin) camps were murdered elsewhere. The latter amounted to 10 131 (3820 + 6311) people. Another 7305 Polish citizens were murdered in Byelorussia and the Ukraine. The pertaining documents were marked: “Must never be opened!”
Kaganovich founded actual slave camps, where the inmates worked in chains. Of the most important Jewish camp commanders (Aaron Soltz, Naftali Frenkel – a Turkish Jew -, Yakov Berman, Sergei Zhuk, Yakov Rapoport, Nakhimson, Yakov Moroz, Abramson, Pliner, Matvei Berman, Samuil Kogan, Samuil Firin, Biskon, Finkelstein, Serpukhovsky). Lazar Kogan was picked out as insufficiently effective. He was executed in 1938 and replaced by another Jew."
Summarizing the situation, Douglas Reed stated:
"In the very week of the Balfour Declaration, the other group of Jews in Russia achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western politicians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself against the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their policies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revolution, too, was 'antisemitism.'"
The Jewishness of Bolshevism has been intentionally obfuscated, but is well noted by authoritative sources. Harold Laski, perhaps one of the foremost experts on Communism, in his article on Bolshevism in the Encyclopedia Britannica (1946), said “In 1897 was founded the Bund, the union of Jewish workers in Poland and Lithuania … They engaged in revolutionary activity upon a large scale, and their energy made them the spear-head of the Party” (Article on “Bolshevism” by Harold J. Laski, Encyclopedia Britannica, 1946, Vol. III, p. 824): http://tinyurl.com/83tgaqw
On the wikipedia article on this subject, a chart is cited purporting that there was an extremely low percentage of Jews in the bolshevik regime. This chart is known to have been a part of a report full of errors: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,716624,00.html
In contrast to the claims in that chart are the State Department documents and arguments of Dmitri Volkolganov cited below, and in the above essay. There is also the admission from the biographer and relative of Lazar Kaganovich, Stuart Kahan, who said said “That Trotsky, unquestionably the most outstanding man among the Bolsheviks, was a Jew did not seem an insuperable obstacle in a party in which the percentage of Jews, 52 percent, was rather high compared to the percentage of Jews (1.8 per cent) in the total population.” (Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81). Kahan’s book has been disputed, but arguments in it’s favor are here – see the section entitled “Reply to the Statement of the Kaganovich family”: http://www.mailstar.net/kaganovich.html
Douglas Reed noted in “The Controversy of Zion” that, “In 1933 the American Jewish journal Opinion stated that Jews occupied almost all important ambassadorial posts and that in [Red] Russia 61 percent of all officials were Jews; it also stated that the Jewish percentage of the population (then given as 158,400,000) was “less than 2 percent”. If this was true it meant that Russia at that time contained less than 3,000,000 Jews. In 1933 the Jewish Chronicle stated that one-third of the Jews in Russia had become officials. If this was the case, they plainly formed the new governing class.”
The Jewish quarterly of 1968 noted that Jewish domination of the Soviet Union occurred past Stalin, under the regime of Nikita Khrushchev, when the Minister of Culture, Yekaterina Furtseva, freely admitted that “the Government has found in some of its departments a heavy concentration of Jewish people, upwards of 50 per cent of its staff.”: http://tinyurl.com/7kqr5w7
So why would the Soviets conceal the actual percentage of Jews in the early regime?
An answer comes from the Encyclopedia Judaica, Volume 5, p. 793, which noted that the Communist International actually instructed Jews to change their names so as to “not confirm right-wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy.”: http://tinyurl.com/87gbgu4
The New York Times actually noted that Lenin’s Jewish roots were deliberately obfuscated! (and as we know from Volkolganov, cited below, Lenin was very much a Jewish chauvinist): http://www.nytimes.com/1992/08/05/opinion/l-lenin-and-the-search-for-jewish-roots-747092.html
In “The Jewish Experience” (1996, p. 364), Jewish historian Norman Cantor admits: “The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath represented, from one perspective, Jewish revenge. … During the heyday of the Cold War, American Jewish publicists spent a lot of time denying that—as 1930s anti-Semites claimed—Jews played a disproportionately important role in Soviet and world Communism. The truth is until the early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing to be ashamed of. In time Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish Communists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. It was a species of striking back.”: http://tinyurl.com/83pcuew
To appreciate how deep this went, note that historian Edward Schoonmaker, writing in “Democracy and World Dominion” (1939, p. 211), discussed how the Bolsheviks razed churches, but spared synagogues:
“Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write:
"According to such information [as] the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands—of the Greek Catholic churches. …" (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12.) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people," had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.": http://tinyurl.com/6t6rquw
It appears that Freemasonry was also involved quite heavily in the spread of Bolshevism. I mentioned before Trotsky's admission of this. Juri Lina has also cited, in an anti-Masonic polemic entitled "Architects of Deception", several sources - most high quality, some low quality, that outline this. I provide this chapter for whatever reader is familiar with the Russian language and can do some fact checking and independent corroboration: http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2008/02/architects-of-deception-part-xiv.html
Of particular interest is a document that is cited as document 1421-1-9064 from the Special Archives in Moscow, which is cited as containing minutes taken from a meeting of the Grand Lodge of Germany in 1917, and which is claimed to say, "The anarchist and revolutionary Lenin actually and consistently represents the political ideal of international freemasonry.". I will attempt to obtain for the purpose of independent corroboration.
Continuing with the previous theme - The Rothschilds, as Bakunin noted, were the subsidizers of Marx, and they and their associates continued to confer with and subsidize revolutionary leaders. Joseph Nedava, in his biography of Trotsky, noted that “A Jewish journalist who knew Trotsky from the period of his stay in Vienna (“when he used to play chess with Baron Rothschild in Cafe Central and frequent Cafe Arkaden daily to read the press there”) is even firmer on the Yiddish issue: “He [Trotsky] knew Yiddish, and if at a later date, in his autobiography, he pretends to know nothing about Jews and Judaism, then this is nothing but a plain lie. He who had visited at Cafe Arkaden for years on end must have mastered both these matters to perfection. The language in greatest use at that Cafe was – besides ‘Viennese-German’ – Yiddish.”"(Trotsky and the Jews, The Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia 5732, 1972, p. 36): http://tinyurl.com/3d3p6dk
So much for Trotsky’s “anti-capitalism” then.
Lenin, also, was quite the Jewish chauvinist, though this fact remained hidden from the general public until the 1990s. Dmitri Volkoganov, former director of the Institute For Military History in the USSR, provides insight on this issue. He writes, “In her letter to Stalin, Anna wrote, ‘It’s probably no secret for you that the research on our grandfather shows that he came from a poor Jewish family … she also asserted … that Lenin’s Jewish origins ‘are further confirmation of the exceptional abilities of the Semitic tribe, always shared by Ilyich … Ilyich always valued the Jews highly’. … Anna’s claim explains, for instance, why Lenin frequently recommended giving foreigners, especially Jews, intellectually demanding tasks, and leaving the elementary work to the ‘Russian fools’.. But a little over a year later, Anna approached Stalin again, asserting that ‘in the Lenin Institute, as well as in the Institute of the Brain … they have long recognized the great gifts of this nation and the extremely beneficial effects of its blood on the progeny of mixed marriages. Ilyich himself rated their revolutionary qualities highly, contrasting it with the more sluggish and unstable character of the Russians. He often pointed out that the great organization and the strength of the revolutionary bodies in the south and west arose precisely from the fact that 50 per cent of their members were of that nationality.’” (Volkoganov, Dmitri. ”Lenin: A New Biography”, pp. 8-9)
Volkoganov also noted:
“He [Lenin] might have been thinking of Parvus (or perhaps himself?) when he said to Gorky: ‘the clever Russian is almost always a Jew or has Jewish blood in him.’” (Volkoganov, Dmitri. Ibid. p. 112)
This all continued during the reign of Stalin. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn noted on p. 79 of “The Gulag Archipelago II” (Harper & Row, 1975), the administrators of Stalin’s Soviet Gulag system were Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel – all Jews.
The Jewish historian Simon Sebag Montefiore stated “Stalin was surrounded by Jewesses – from Polina Molotova and Maria Svanidze to Poskrebysheva and Yezhova. Beria’s son, reliable on gossip, dubious on politics, recalled that his father gleefully listed Stalin’s affairs with Jewesses.”(Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, p. 273)
As New York Times records from the time period show, contrary to popular opinion, Stalin did marry a Jewess, the sister of his mass murdering deputy Lazar Kaganovich (http://tinyurl.com/7uyxrhq), named Rosa (http://tinyurl.com/6dp8aaz).
Montefiore also noted that after the purges of Stalin's Trotskyite Competitors (and the Moscow show trials were based on 90% fabricated evidence, but were 10% correct: http://mailstar.net/stalin-purges.html) even though Jews were a minority of total party members in Soviet Russia at the time (Stalin was giving the appearance of advocating "National Communism"), they still formed a majority of the government. Thus they were the dominant minority. He noted, “Many Jewish Bolsheviks used Russian pseudonyms. As early as 1936, Stalin ordered Mekhlis at Pravda to use these pseudonyms: ‘No need to excite Hitler!’” (Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, p. 306)
Montefiore also noted in “Young Stalin” (2008), p. 186 that Stalin, prior to the revolution, was “on the Rothschild payroll”: http://tinyurl.com/3sret6c, and on p. 90, that “Stalin started laughing, almost singing: “I’m working for the Rothschilds”": http://tinyurl.com/3hfveof
As this article from the Russian International News Agency shows, Stalin’s army was very much a Jewish controlled army: http://tinyurl.com/8ycwdcu
I have noted that Stalin made "anti-Semitism" illegal. Further contradicting the myth of “Stalinist anti-Semitism”, we can find pictures of Stalin with a Yarmulke (http://tinyurl.com/77lfxtt).
The newspaper Jewish Voice launched the following slogan on p. 23 of it’s 1941 July, August issue: “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”: http://tinyurl.com/6hkbm86
This continued, even after WWII. At the Yalta conference in 1945 Stalin declared: “I am a Zionist” (http://tinyurl.com/82atqu3), and whatever the public perception was, that fact still remained. As David Rockefeller shows in his memoirs, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia had established as late as the 1970s that the Soviets and Israelis were deeply allied (http://tinyurl.com/7rhpef3), that purported “Soviet anti-Zionism” was merely a ruse. Ivor Benson has established with many examples that this was the case, in his book “The Zionist Factor” (http://tinyurl.com/7dz6w6q).
After Communism “fell” in Russia, the oligarchs gained ascendancy. Interestingly, these oligarchs – Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Boris Hait, Mikhail Friedman, Vladimir Vinogradov, Vladimir Potanin, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Alexander Smolensky, and Pyotr Aven – were almost all (9 out of 10) Jewish (http://tinyurl.com/8x23n44). The only non-Jewish oligarch was Sergei Mavrodi, a Madoff-like con artist who perpetrated a massive ponzi-scheme through his company MMM. Recently, one of these oligarchs, Khodorkovsky, was arrested, and when he was arrested, guess who he gave his oil assets to? Jacob Rothschild (http://tinyurl.com/6w9mkor)!
Now, naturally we would have to modify our perspective on the Nazi movement given the above information. First, it is important to note that Germany, like every other country, was within the Rothschild net, but nevertheless, within it’s limitations, it was attempting to achieve national determination in a manner that did not comply with the rules set out for them by the British cosmopolitan “free trade” imperialists. They thrived, using protectionist and Nationalist methods as laid out by Frederich List (see, for more on this, “A Century of War” by F. William Engdahl, ch. 1-3).
So, of course, Britain maneuvered to squash Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm II discussed the reality of the situation, which he only discovered when it was too late. He said, referring to uncovering proof of an agreement, “the Anglo-Saxon world as far back as 1897 had combined against us, and therein is explained a number of obstacles encountered by Germany in her foreign policy. It also explains America’s attitude in the war. … In view of the grouping of England, France and Russia-three very strong Powers-only one political course lay open to Germany; the threat of deciding Germany’s future by force of arms must be avoided until we had secured for ourselves such an economic, military, naval, and politically national position in the world as to make it seem advisable to our opponents to refrain from risking a decision by arms, and to yield us in the share in the apportionment and management of the world to which our ability entitled us. We neither desired nor were we entitled to jeopardize our hard-won position.” (http://tinyurl.com/7xhl6j6)
Prof. Roland Usher stated in “Pan-Germanism” in 1913, Chapter X, pp. 139-140, that an understanding was reached, before the summer of 1897, that in case of war the United States would promptly declare in favor of England and France and would do her utmost to assist them. He noted: “The alliance, for it was nothing less, was based upon infinitely firmer ground than written words and sheets of parchment …” (http://tinyurl.com/6rfv7wm)
Now, there were anglophile agents like Carnegie and J.P. Morgan (who floated loans to the Entente even before America entered into the war), but there was powerful Zionist influence in the united states, especially through the firm Kuhn Loeb, & Co, and this was pro-German.
But in spite of this, the Zionists knew which way the tide was turning. I bring attention, of course, to Max Nordeau's "prediction". And also of relevance is letter from arms manufacturer and British Israelism promoter George Nelson Walsh to an Egyptian courier named Mohammed Hassan, quoted by Dr. Otto Kuntzemueller in The New York Times Current History: The European War (Volume 5): http://tinyurl.com/bu6k8k2
"A great war will take place in Europe through which all nations except England will suffer. The Jews will be driven from all countries and will place themselves under the protection of England. The English will receive them with open arms as their long lost brothers; equip them with everything, and send them to Palestine in large ships for the purpose of having them establish themselves in their own land.
In those days remember the time is near the English, together with the Jews, will rule the whole world, and honor, peace and contentment will be everywhere present. The Jews will be the first to rejoice through their connection with the English, and the Arabs the next."
For the next part, Freedman's presentation provides insight.
Germany had been betrayed in the War and had been crushed by the Entente. Things only got worse from there. Of the people who imposed such strict reparations on German, the journalist E.J. Dillon said the following, in “The Inside Story of the Peace Conference”, p. 496, “It may seem amazing to some readers, but it is none the less a fact, that a considerable number of delegates believed that the real influences behind the Anglo-Saxon peoples were Semitic.” (http://tinyurl.com/7ep2dno) Dillon continued, (p. 497), “They confronted the President’s proposal on the subject of religious inequality, and, in particular, the odd motive alleged for it, with the measures for the protection of minorities which he subsequently imposed on the lesser states, and which had for their keynote to satisfy the Jewish elements in Eastern Europe. And they concluded that the sequence of expedients framed and enforced in this direction were inspired by the Jews, assembled in Paris for the purpose of realizing their carefully thought-out program, which they succeeded in having substantially executed. However right or wrong these delegates may have been, it would be a dangerous mistake to ignore their views, seeing that they have since become one of the permanent elements of the situation. The formula into which this policy was thrown by the members of the Conference, whose countries it affected, and who regarded it as fatal to the peace of Eastern Europe, was this: ‘Henceforth the world will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon peoples, who, in turn, are swayed by their Jewish elements.’” (http://tinyurl.com/7gk6bpn)
These Jewish elements had imposed significant hardships on Germany.
Given this, we need to re-evaluate the origins of Nazism. The fact is – unfortunately, that the Jewish power structure in Europe was in the 1920s so strong that it would have not allowed an uncorrupted opposition to emerge. You need only read my above article on the Rothschilds to realize that they had complete financial domination of Europe by the beginning of the 20th Century. So, on the subject of Nazism, these people probably thought that they had a movement of controlled opposition in their hands, which they could use as a dialectical anti-thesis to Stalin. As Douglas Reed noted, “for great successes, which they could not otherwise achieve, Soviet Communism and Political Zionism needed an apparent antithesis, as a heavyweight champion needs a sparring partner.” Protocol 12 states – “we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.”
Hitler was associated with the Spartacists in the short lived Bavarian Soviet Republic (http://mothman777.wordpress.com/comment-in-reply-to-1919-hitler-marches-in-memory-of-a-jewish-communist-7-april-2012-from-httpwinstonsmithministryoftruth-blogspot-com/). Hitler's collaborators also actually paid accolades to Lenin (http://tinyurl.com/796hlxg). Furthermore, a 1937 letter from former German Chancellor Heinrich Brüning to Winston Churchill revealed that Zionists financed the Nazis. It said: http://tinyurl.com/6ujzrog
"I did not and do not even today, for understandable reasons, wish to reveal that from October 1928 the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith, and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany."
To further show the extent to which Jewish finance was responsible for Hitler - Franz von Papen, Vice-Chancellor under Adolf Hitler from 1933-1934, noted in his "Memoirs" (http://tinyurl.com/7et8hdk), "the most documented account of the National Socialists' sudden acquisition of funds was contained in a book published in Holland in 1933, by the old established Amsterdam publishing house of Van Holkema & Warendorf, called De Geldbronnen van Het Nationaal-Socialisme (Drie Gesprekken Met Hitler) under the name "Sidney Warburg."" This book, which goes now by the name "Hitler's Secret Backers", and which corroborates "Red Symphony", shows how a Warburg (not Max, but probably James or Seigmund) was responsible for the rise of Hitler. It can be read here: http://tinyurl.com/6vd9zp6
A document also exists referring Hjalmar Schacht to the Reichsbank, with both Adolf Hitler's and Max Warburg's signatures on it. Antony Sutton refers to it in "Wall St. and the Rise of Hitler", and a facsimile of it appears in "The Fourth Reich of the Rich" by Des Griffin. In "Our Crowd: The Great Jewish Families of New York", Stephen Birmingham discusses collaboration that went on between Max Warburg and the Nazis until 1938: http://tinyurl.com/7skce5m
Yet Hitler bit the hand that fed him. This is why he is so despised today. Because when he gathered enough strength, he was able to revolt against the economic leeches from the Rothschild and Warburg families and cast off their influence. Niall Ferguson’s biography of the Rothschild family, The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World’s Banker: 1849-1999 (Penguin, 2000), although sympathetic the Rothschilds, outlines the reality of the National Socialists’ war against them. Ferguson writes: http://books.google.com/books?ei=ivF8T8m9BcT30gH337H9Cw&id=orSqdFRW158C&dq=The+House+of+Rothschild&q=An+Altogether+more+ruthless+coalition
“An altogether more ruthless coalition had come to power in Germany in 1933, dominated by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Hostility to the Rothschilds’ had been a feature of Nazi propaganda from the movement’s infancy (see introduction to volume 1) despite the fact that the Frankfurt house had been wound up when Hitler was barely twelve years old. It was a hostility that soon translated into action. At first the attacks were largely symbolic: in December 1933 the Frankfurt Rothschildallee was renamed Karolingerallee, while the Luisenplatz and Mathildenstrasse lost the plaques identifying them with members of the family. It was not until April 1938, with the “Ordinance on the Registration of Jewish Assets,” that Rothschild property came under direct attack. In the wake of the orchestrated anti-Semitic demonstrations of the following November (Reichskristallnacht), nearly all the myriad of charitable and educational foundations — of which there were around twenty — were dissolved, with the exception of the Carolinum Dental Clinic, which had become part of the Frankfurt University. The largest of these, the Baron Wilhelm Carl von Rothschild Foundation, was “Aryanised” under pressure from the city authorities, so that all references to its founder were expunged. At the same time, the Reich Association of Jews in Germany was forced to sell the Mathilde von Rothschild Paediatric Hospital, the Georgine Sara von Rothschild Foundation for Infirm Foreign Israelites and the Rothschild residence at Grosser Wollgraben 26 to the Frankfurt municipality. The Gestapo also confiscated the A.M. von Rothschild Sanatorium for Lung Diseases in the Black Forest. At least four other Rothschild-founded institutions suffered the same fate.
The private property of the few family members still resident in Germany was expropriated by similar methods, though there was in fact relatively little of it left by 1938. Before the process of confiscation began, Max von-Goldscmidt-Rothschild’s son Albert, Rudolf and Erich sold the family houses at the Grüneburg and Königstein and opted to emigrate (Albert to Switzerland, where he committed suicide in 1941 when faced with the threat of expulsion). But Maximilian — now 95 — was too old to leave. He stayed on in the house in the Bockenheimer Landstrasse, with the garden which his wife’s great-uncle Amschel had acquired over a century before the earliest days of Jewish emancipation in Frankfurt. Or rather he was allowed to occupy a room in the house; for in tragic fulfilment of Amschel’s nightmare — dating back to the night in 1815 when he first slept in the “free air” of the garden — Maximilian was forced to sell the property to the city of Frankfurt for just 610,000 reichsmarks (less tax). In the aftermath of Kristallnacht he was also obliged to sell his art collection to the city for 2.3 million reichsmarks (again less tax) and to donate a further 25 percent of his remaining assets to the Reich as an “atonement payment”…
… Discovered, was no longer the Vienna house by the Alliance. In addition, the Witkowitz board had safeguarded against sequestration the company’s stake in the Swedish Freya ore mines as well as £200,000 in foreign currency. Louis [Nathaniel de Rothschild of Austria] therefore had a real bargaining position. When Himmler sought to ingratiate himself by sending some ornate French furniture to the prison, he was able to send it away complaining that it made his cell look like a “Cracow Bordello.” Although Louis had to hand over most of his Austrian assets to secure his own release, the family was able to insist that a price be paid for Witkowitz (albeit a discounted price). But such legal niceties were ultimately bound to be swept aside by Nazi force majeure. Eugene’s hopes of selling the ironworks to the Czechoslovak state for £10 million were dashed when Hitler bullied the Prague government into accepting partition in March 1939. With the works effectively under German control, Goring’s Commissioner Hans Kehrl, Rasche and Paul Pleiger (the Reichswerke’s general director). At the same time Fritz Kranefuss — Himmler’s adjutant and a supervisory board member of the Dresdner bank — informed Rasche on the basis of Sicherheitsdienst intelligence that the transfer abroad of the ownership of Witkowitz had been illegal under currency laws. Finally, in July 1939, it was agreed to sell the plant for £2.9 million. However, the outbreak of war gave the Germans the perfect excuse not to pay. As a result, Witkowitz joined the lengthening list of Rothschild properties confiscated without compensation by the Nazi regime. In January 1941 Goring was able to take the process a step further when 43,300 Witkowitz shares were seized from the vaults of the Paris house (though even this did not give him a technical controlling interest). (It was not until 1953 that the communist government established in Czechoslovakia in 1948 finally paid compensation to the Rothschilds — amounting to £1 millon — for the works.) Yet it was not their industrial investments which Hitler and his lackeys really coveted so much as their investments in art — the Old Masters, the Sevres, the Louis Quinze bureaus — which were the most dazzling fruits of the family’s financial success. In fleeing Austria, Alphonse had left behind one of the great European private collections; and attempts to buy it by Lord Duveen (possibly bidding on behalf of the original owners) were in vain. For the acquisition of so many old masters had given Hitler the idea of establishing a new German gallery at Linz, to give the Reich its Louvre. In 1939 he authorized Hans Posse to begin work on the project, putting the best works seized from Austrian Jews into a “Fuhrer reserve” for this purpose. …
Up until the outbreak of war in 1939, the corollary of the expropriation of the Jews was their emigration from German territory. (It was significant in this respect that the Rothschild palace in the Prinz Eugenstrasse was occupied by Adolf Eichmann’s Central Office for Jewish Emigration, which worked closely with Rafelsberger’s Asset Transactions Office.) Naturally many (though not all) German and Austrian Jews wanted to get out, while the Nazis had no objection to their leaving, provided they could be mulcted in the process. Leading German Jewish bankers — notably Max Warburg — saw little alternative but to facilitate this process. However, for Jews like the Rothschilds who remained outside the area of German control, this created a number of acute dilemmas. …
The only logical solution was therefore to find some alternative territory for the Jews to go to. The Nazis themselves thought of Madagascar. Interestingly, Guy Burgess’s first assignment (when he was still a freelance intelligence agent) from MI6′s D section was — as he faithfully reported to Moscow in December 1938 — “to activate Lord Rothschild” in an attempt to “split the Jewish movement” and “create an opposition to Zionism and Dr Weitzmann [sic].” At around the same time, the Paris house [of the Rothschild family] forwarded to New Court a proposal to purchase 200,000 acres of Brazil’s Mato Grosso “for colonisation purposes”; and another to settle Jews in Sudan’s Upper Nile Valley between Malakhal and Bor — supposedly “a huge territory … with no population and where Jews might organize themselves an important colony.” Kenya, Northern Rhodesia and Guiana were also considered. Only at the eleventh hour, it seems, did the Rothschilds recognize the need to admit refugees into Britain and France. In March 1939 Edouard’s wife Germaine turned an old house at the edge of the Ferrieres estate into a hostel for around 150 refugee children. After the German invasion they were evacuated south and later dispersed, some escaping to the United States. …
By 1939, of course, numerous members of the Rothschild family were themselves refugees. The German invasion of France in May 1940 increased their number substantially. Even before the fall of Paris, Robert had already reached the safety of Montreal, taking with him his wife Nelly and daughters Diane and Cecile. It was not until July, however, that his cousin and senior partner Edouard — now in his seventies — opted to leave France, finally reaching the United States after a circuitous journey through Spain and Portugal. (He too was accompanied by his wife Germaine and daughter Bethsabee, his eldest daughter Jacqueline having already settled in America with her second husband.) Their former partner Maurice also ended up in Canada, while his ex-wife Noemie and son Edmond took refuge at the estate at Pregny. The other French Rothschild of that generation, Henri, was already resident in Portugal. Finally, Alain’s pregnant wife reached the US via Spain and Brazil, while Guy’s wife Alix took the route through Argentina, though she later rejoined her husband.
… Occupied France to confiscate “possessions of the Palais Rothschild,” including any which had been handed over to the French state. The following month, the Germans ordered that administrators be put in charge of the Jewish firms. The Luftwaffe and later a German general occupied the Rothschild house at 23 avenue de Marigny.
Yet the Germans soon found themselves in competition with the puppet Vichy regime they themselves had called into being. Even before Keitel’s order, the Petain regime issued a decree which declared that all Frenchman who had left mainland France after May 10 had “removed themselves from the responsibilities and duties of members of the national community.”
Accordingly, their assets were to be confiscated and sold, the proceeds going to the Vichy state. This was explicitly applied to Edouard, Robert and Henri. Soon after this, Petain laid claim to the Rothschild offices in the rue Laffitte for a government welfare agency and showed every sign of intending to treat other buildings belonging to the family in a similar fashion, putting them all in the hands of a new Public Property Office.
In some ways, it made little difference to the Rothschilds whether it was the Germans or the Vichy regime which stole their property. The latter was motivated by anti-Semitism too, as evidenced by the decrees Petain issued on October 3, 1940 and June 2, 1941, which drastically restricted the rights of French Jews, and the constant vitriolic attacks on the Rothschilds in pro-German papers like Partis-Soir and Au Pilori. Nor can it be seriously argued that Vichy officials were somehow more lenient in their treatment of Rothschild property than the Germans would have been. Maurice Janicot, who ran Petain’s Public Property Office, is said to have prevented the Germans from clearing the cellars of Lafite, for example; but a lack of buyers seems the most likely explanation for his failure to sell Elie’s Neuilly stable of horses, Alain’s house on the rue du Cirque and Miriam’s houses in Boulogne and Paris. As can be seen from his statement to German authorities in May 1941 — to the effect that de Rothschild Freres now belonged to the Vichy state — the aim was to pre-empt the Germans, not to protect the Rothschilds. The attempt by Petain’s Commissariat for the Jewish Questions to convert the Institut de biologie physico-chimique founded by Edmond in 1927 into a laboratory for the eugenicist Alex Carrel says much about the fundamental compatibility of Vichy and the Third Reich.
… If Hitler had successfully launched “Operation Sealion” in the summer of 1940, when Britain was at her most vulnerable, a similar fate might have befallen the English Rothschilds and their remaining private collections — a worse fate probably, as the invasion of Britain would have made the ultimate defeat of Germany infinitely harder to achieve.“
A biography of Louis von Rothschild (1882-1955), states: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.bornpower.de/roth3-2.htm&ei=AAB8T_u1FMncggeb2rySDA&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.bornpower.de/roth3-2.htm%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3Dpd1%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official%26prmd%3Dimvns
“The collapse of the Creditanstalt in 1931 had an impact across Europe and caused death of a bank. Only action of the Paris and London Rothschild banks could collapse the Vienna Rothschild bank is prevented. A foreign creditor Cttee led by Lionel Rothschild / London and Lord Kindersley, the bank finally restored. But only a few years later came the final blow: 1938 Louis was arrested by the Nazis and held for a year in jail until the complicated negotiations over his release were completed. Rothschild was allowed to leave the country only if he renounced all Austrian possessions. A truly princely ransom. The war effort Vítkovice plant, which provided 30% of crude steel, 30% coal and 40% of the pig iron was in Austria, but was previously transferred to an English company, so that the Nazis could not confiscate the works simply. It was not until after the outbreak of the war Goering took over the works. (After the war, the Czech Communists confiscated the work and paid the Rothschilds in 1953, a compensation) The vast art collections (several 1000 objects) of the Rothschilds were also seized. This ended the presence of the Rothschilds on Austrian soil. The childless Louis went into exile in the United States.”
The modern-day Rothschilds discuss this on their website: http://www.rothschild.com/our_history/1914-1945/
“The crash of 1929 brought problems, not least in Austria where Louis von Rothschild struggled hard to shore up the Creditanstalt, Austria’s largest bank, to prevent collapse. Less than a decade later a darker tide arrived; the Austrian Rothschilds’ interests were seized in 1938 by the Nazis, bringing to an end more than a century at the heart of middle European banking. In France and Austria, the family was scattered for the duration of the war.”
Several New York Times articles also refer to this event:
“… The [Austrian Rothschild] family’s holdings were seized by the Nazis during the German Anschluss in 1938. [. . .] Their holdings had been vastly reduced, in part because of wartime destruction by the Nazis….” (“At $90 Million, Rothschild Sale Exceeds Goals.” New York Times. July 09, 1999.): http://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/09/world/at-90-million-rothschild-sale-exceeds-goals.html?ref=rothschildfamily
“A year after the Austrian Government agreed to return about $40 million worth of art and objects that the Nazis confiscated from the Austrian branch of the Rothschild family, members of the 256-year-old banking dynasty have decided to sell the collection.” (“Austrian Rothschilds Decide to Sell; Sotheby’s in London Will Auction $40 Million in Art Seized by Nazis.” New York Times. April 10, 1999.): http://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/10/arts/austrian-rothschilds-decide-sell-sotheby-s-london-will-auction-40-million-art.html?ref=rothschildfamily&pagewanted=1
So from this we can infer that he knew what he had to do to gain power in a controlled world, and when he gathered enough strength, he was able to cast off deleterious influences. He then revitalized Germany. He instituted radical monetary reforms by basing German money on production rather than Gold or foreign exchanges (http://tinyurl.com/6umtyxk - Ingrid Zundel goes into this in greater detail: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/13/hitler-and-the-banksters-the-abolition-of-interest-servitude/). And Germany's economy flourished. Under National Socialist economic policies, unemployment went from 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% in 1938 (League of Nations, World Economic Survey: Eighth Year, 1938/39 (Geneva, 1939), 128 - cited in Folsom, Burton W. "New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR's Economic Legacy Has Damaged America". New York: Threshold Editions, 2008. p. 243)
He also threw off the support he gave to the Zionist movement, intended to deport Jews to Madagascar instead, put forth condemnations of Zionism, and allied himself with Arab/Muslim interests:
"In the Nazi view, Zionism remained in the context of a conspiracy. Hitler himself presented an early version of this view in Mein Kampf, when he contemptuously rejected the “lie” that Zionism was primarily a movement focused on creation of a homeland for the Jews in Palestine. “For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” For Hitler and the Nazi regime, Jewish immigration to Palestine could never be part of a “solution,” final or otherwise, to “the Jewish question” in Europe. Nazi opposition to a Jewish state was rooted in the core ideological conviction that a Jewish state in Palestine would become a component, or perhaps the very headquarters, of “international Jewry’s” efforts to dominate the globe.
Alfred Rosenberg, though also convinced of the existence of a Jewish conspiracy, showed less alarm about Zionism in his essays of the 1920s and 1930s than Hitler did. Rosenberg’s key text on the subject was Dar Staatsfeindliche Zionismus (Zionism hostile to the state), which he initially published in 1921 and which the main Nazi publishing house brought out again in 1938. In it he argued that the Jews were incapable of statecraft. If a Jewish state in Palestine were to be established, it would collapse and again the Jews would become an “international nation.” Zionism was “the ineffectual effort of an incapable people to engage in productive activity. Mostly it was a means for ambitious speculators to establish a new arena for receiving usurious interest on a global scale.” In the midst of WWII, Hitler’s view that a Jewish state would provide another base for the international Jewish conspiracy displaced Rosenberg’s contempuous dismissal and fostered a convergence of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.
Giselher Wirsing’s Englander, Juden, Araber in Palestina (The English, the Jews and the Arabs in Palestine), published in 1939 … defined the Zionist goal as the “establishment of a Vatican of world Jewry. A firm base is to be built on which in later years Jewish world policy can rest.” Wirsing argued that a Jewish state would foster cooperation between the Jews in Palestine and the assimilated Jews who worked in finance and banking in Western Europe and the United States, thereby strengthening their existing political and economic power.”
In 1936 Arno Schickedanz, a high-ranking official of the Foreign Affairs Office of the NSDAP (APA) as well as in the Reich Ministry for the Occupied Territories, published an article called Der Zionismus (Zionism) in which he reiterated the view that Zionism was not merely an attempt to establish a “Jewish homeland” in Palestine but rather an effort to ensconce Jewish rule over the world (centered in Jerusalem), as a fulfillment of Jewish Torah prophecy: http://judithwinther.dk/emner/niveau_3/hoaxfact/der_zionismus.html
"Non-Jewish observers and writers on Zionism, who see political Zionism only as an attempt at “national renewal” rather than an effort to establish a unified Jewish leadership as well as Jewish rule over the world, are therefore incorrect. The confusion of political Zionism with Palestine can be understood only through the Jewish prophecies in which Jewry is assured of control over all the goods of this world. Knowing that the time was near, and would culminate in taking possession of Palestine, Zionism developed the nonsensical notion of an “historic claim” to the “promised land,” to which Jews “without any outside pressure” would gradually emigrate.
In the ideology of political Zionism, Palestine fulfilled the role of an indispensable part of prophecy, just as certain rules are the guarantee for success in the magical ceremonies of primitive peoples. Political Zionism never intended Palestine to be the destination of all Jews, but rather it merely wants to make Palestine the center of Jewish world policy. That must naturally be protected by a strong Jewish population. The Zionist publication Jüdische Rundschau wrote: “No one at any time has proposed that all Jews today should emigrate to Palestine.” Nahum Sokolow, Weizmann’s colleague and current chairman of the Zionist Committee, said it clearly in 1921: “The Jewish people wants to return to Palestine; the Jewish people will have its center in Palestine. Large parts of Jewry will live as a Jewish periphery in the world. They must be cared for; their dignity and their national rights must be assured.” [...]
That provides a correction to the idealization of Zionism, which springs from a different race. From a political standpoint, it would be in the interests of the whole world, of all the host peoples, if the Jews now scattered throughout the whole world were to voluntarily emigrate to some habitable territory. If political Zionism were not interested in such a solution to the Jewish Question, it would be in the interests of the host peoples to point it in that positive direction. The only question would be whether Palestine is the proper gathering place, which no one would likely maintain. Palestine is not able to absorb all the Jews in the world, entirely aside from the fact of increasing Arab opposition to Jewish infiltration. The Arabs are, after all, the undisputed owners of the land. But what other territory would be appropriate? And at the instant Palestine ceased to be the goal of Jewish emigration, political Zionism would collapse, since Palestine is seen as a means for the fulfillment of prophecy. Without that, the whole enterprise would lose its point. Jewry itself would make the most passionate and bitter attacks, and before long any undertaking that ignored Palestine would be crippled by Jewry itself. Palestine incorporates for Jewry its special position. Ignoring this would be ethnic suicide for Jewry, since political Zionism also has as a goal maintaining and strengthening Jewry’s special situation."
Hitler, by attacking these dominant interests, made himself a target for extreme libels. The facts of history, however, refute these libels. To give just one example, Hitler's Germany was more racially progressive then that of the allies. There is a lie that Hitler reacted violently when Jesse Owens, a Black Olympic athlete, was victorious. In fact, Hitler did shake Jesse Owens’ hand: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1205572/Hitler-shook-hands-black-1936-Olympic-hero-Jesse-Owens.html
Likewise, Hitler’s Army was much more racially diverse than that of the allies. Contrary to the myths surrounding him, he even had Jewish soldiers. Veronica Clark has written about this, and an overview can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/87390076/Nazi-German-Armed-Forces-Affirmative-Action
I dislike the Nazis because to me, they were like children, in need of an eternal father figure to govern their lives. But nevertheless, we need to acknowledge that Hitler has been libeled tremendously. As the reader can see, I have refuted many of those libels, and a good further counter to them is in the documentary of which the following is an introduction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A1pSJlj4Ac
Although they were living in an authoritarian collectivist government, which is something I in no way support, the citizens of Nazi Germany were faring much better than they previously were: http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/03/01/a-perfect-german-sunday-in-the-third-reich/, http://zioncrimefactory.com/2012/04/03/the-holiest-mission/ (this website has been hijacked and taken over by a Christian Identity proponent, but the documentation still pertains to how the site was before the take over)
We can see a very different portrayal of Hitler from what is commonly portrayed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AUgjZJoBRE, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7c9tB77YdU
Contrary to postwar myths, Hitler did not plan to enslave and subjugate all of Europe. Stalin actually did, and Hitler acted as a buffer against this. I have the relevant primary source documents proving this, scanned from Joachim Hoffman's masterwork "Stalin's War of Extermination", as part of a collection I have produced here: http://archive.org/details/IcebreakerWhoStartedTheSecondWorldWar
The Nazis, it is important to remember, were motivated by their aversion to Bolshevism, and it permeated their propaganda (http://tinyurl.com/88ks723). They actually thought of themselves as people liberating Eastern Europe from a Soviet hell, and they were greeted in that manner (http://tinyurl.com/733crdb, http://tinyurl.com/7en2gpl)
David Lloyd George was very emphatic that the Nazis did not want war (http://tinyurl.com/7598uhx), though they had a profound dislike for Bolshevism (http://tinyurl.com/87dases). "Red Symphony" establishes that the Soviets were led to go into war because of Hitler's radical economic policies, because he bit the hand that fed him and cut off from international finance.
So those who I will call Illuminist Jewry were playing with fire, realized it, and crushed their opponents in WWII. The Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann, as tensions surfaced between Germany and Britain, on September 10, 1941, offered Churchill to get the U.S. into war. He said, “we did it before, and we’ll do it again” [referring to previous Zionist intrigues in World War 1] (Weizmann-Churchill correspondence, from the Weizmann archives in Rehovot, Israel): http://ia600403.us.archive.org/2/items/ZionismAndTheWorldWars/Weizmann-Letter.jpg
The U.S. Secretary of Defense James Forrestal recorded in his diaries that according to Neville Chaimberlain, Jewry in America wanted war also (http://tinyurl.com/86gxpc9), so the pressure was on both sides of the Atlantic.
As Hitler said in his last testament: "It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.": http://www.hitler.org/writings/last_testament/
David Irving is a well known writer on this subject, with his book "Hitler's War and the War Path": http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/2001/HW1.pdf
Irving has been attacked for this, because he is a mainstream historian, who has nevertheless challenged the standard narrative on these issues. The world's best “Holocaust” scholars with teams of post-grad assistants, bankrolled by Spielberg & Bronfman, prepared for over two years for the Irving v Penguin & Lipstadt trial. But according to Grays' final judgement: "The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." Judgement 6:80 http://www.hdot.org/en/trial/judgement/06.15 He goes onto to judge: "Having considered the various arguments advanced by Irving to assail the effect of the convergent evidence relied on by the Defendants, it is my conclusion that no objective, fair-minded historian would have serious cause to doubt that there were gas chambers at Auschwitz and that they were operated on a substantial scale to kill hundreds of thousands of Jews." Judgement 13.91 http://www.hdot.org/en/trial/judgement/13.41 It’s claimed that it’s an indisputable fact that Nazis gassed Jews, yet there's no tangible evidence, but that's irrelevant to the pushers of this narrative. And the two same Russians who compiled the completely fraudulent report on the Germans perpetrating the Katyn Massacre (IMT doc USSR-54) also compiled the report on Auschwitz (IMT doc USSR-008), which is cited by Raul Hilberg, William Shirer, and Jean-Claude Pressac.
But that's irrelevant to the pushers of this narrative. They may have completely lied about Katyn, but we are supposed to believe that they were 100% honest about Auschwitz. A correspondent has outlined this beautifully: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.com/2012/01/ok-we-lied-about-katyn-but-we-told.html
Irving was overwhelmed by the monetary power of his opponents, and thus the court acted against him. Nevertheless, Justice Gray did give high praise for Irving as an historian:
"13.7 My assessment is that, as a military historian, Irving has much to commend him. For his works of military history Irving has undertaken thorough and painstaking research into the archives. He has discovered and disclosed to historians and others many documents which, but for his efforts, might have remained unnoticed for years. It was plain from the way in which he conducted his case and dealt with a sustained and penetrating cross-examination that his knowledge of World War 2 is unparalleled. His mastery of the detail of the historical documents is remarkable. He is beyond question able and intelligent. He was invariably quick to spot the significance of documents which he had not previously seen. Moreover he writes his military history in a clear and vivid style. I accept the favourable assessment by Professor Watt and Sir John Keegan of the calibre of Irving's military history (mentioned in paragraph 3.4 above) and reject as too sweeping the negative assessment of Evans (quoted in paragraph 3.5)."
He then stated
"13.8 But the questions to which this action has given rise do not relate to the quality of Irving's military history but rather to the manner in which he has written about the attitude adopted by Hitler towards the Jews and in particular his responsibility for the fate which befell them under the Nazi regime."
Justice Grey then produced a hostile judgement against Irving. The transcript is from the website of Irving's opponent, Deborah Lipstadt, who is of course a vociferous critic of Irving. Nevertheless, it does show that he is not as others view him.
See, for an argument against the judge, information about his appeal, particularly on the Dresden case: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/rebuttal/Dresden/index.html
Here is the document book forming the basis of that appeal, which goes a long way to refute commonly accepted arguments against him: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/rebuttal/doc_book.html
The following overview by Paul Grubach looks at the trial, and shows the absurdity of the idea that Hitler had any "exterminationist" intentions: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/books/Evans/Grubach.html
Yet, as a renegade historian who has a foot in the mainstream, he succumbed to cowardice, and defended many Allied myths on the subject. A critique of this is provided here: http://juergen-graf.vho.org/articles/david-irving-and-the-aktion-reinhardt-camps.html
The Nazis were subject to very cruel treatment in what Douglas Reed accurately described as "The Talmudic Vengeance". Writing in an epnoymous chapter of "The Controversy of Zion", he noted:
"Certain symbolic deeds were evidently meant to establish the authorship, or nature, of the vengeance. These crowning acts of symbolism were the reproductions, after nearly thirty years, of the similar acts committed during the revolution in Russia: the Talmudic boast left on the wall of the Romanoffs' death chamber and the canonization of Judas Iscariot. After the Second World War the Nazi leaders were hanged on the Jewish Day of Judgment in 1946, so that their execution was presented to Jewry in the shape of Mordecai's vengeance on Haman and his sons. Then in the Bavarian village of Oberammergau, where the world-famous Passion Play had been performed for three centuries, the players of the chief parts were put on trial for "Nazi activities" before a Communist court. Those who appeared as Jesus and the apostles were all declared guilty; the one performer acquitted was he who took the part of Judas.
These things do not happen by accident, and the vengeance on Germany, like the earlier one on Russia, was in this way given the imprint of a Talmudic vengeance (that is, a vengeance on Christendom, the Talmud being the specifically anti-Christian continuation of the pre-Christian Torah). The vengeful writ ran on both sides of the line which by that time was supposed to be an "Iron Curtain" dividing "the free world" from the enslaved Asiatic one; in this matter of vengeance there was no iron curtain. Nuremberg was in the Western zone; Oberammergau in the Soviet one.
By the choice of the Jewish Day of Judgment for the hanging of the Nazi leaders and German commanders the Western leaders gave the conclusion of the Second War this aspect of a vengeance exacted specifically in the name of "the Jews". The shape which the trial took showed the purpose of the immense propaganda of falsification conducted during the war, which I have earlier described. "Crimes against Jews" were singled out as a separate count, as if Jews were different from other human beings (and when the judgment was delivered a hundred million human beings in Eastern Europe had been handed over to the general persecution of all men, from which Jews in their proportion suffered in Germany). This particular indictment was made "the crux of the case" against the defendants (Captain Liddell Hart's words) and was based on the assertion that "six million Jews" had been killed (as time went by the word "perished" was substituted for "killed"). An impartial court would at the outset have thrown out any suit based on this completely unverifiable assertion: At Nuremberg lawyers, who in a private case would have demanded acquittal on the strength of an unproven statement in respect of a decimal point or digit, used this fantastic figure as the basis of their demand for conviction.
I earlier described, with illustrations from Jewish sources, the process by means of which, over the years, the Jews were "singled out" from the mass of Hitler's victims and their number inflated at will from day to day (Hitler's book-bonfire became "the burning of Jewish books"; his concentration camps where ninety percent of the inmates were Germans became concentration camps for Jews; a wartime report about the killing of" 150,000 White Russians, Ukrainians and Jews at Kieff" was changed to "150,000 Jews"; and so on interminably).
The statement about the "six million Jews", allowed to pass without question by the men on the bench, was the end-product of this process. In six years of war the Germans, Japanese and Italians, using every lethal means, killed 824,928 British, British Commonwealth and American fighting-men, merchant sailors and civilians. Assuming that the Germans killed, say, half of these in Europe, they killed (according to this assertion) fifteen times as many Jews there. To do that, they would have needed such quantities of men, weapons, transports, guards and materials as would have enabled them to win the war many times over.
The figure would not even deserve scrutiny if it had not been used to give the Second War the brand of "a Jewish war" and if that, again, did not foreshadow the shape of any third war. Because of that, it may be examined here.
At no time in history, from antiquity to this day, can the number of Judahites, Judeans or Jews, living at any given time, be determined; for that reason the number afflicted in any calamity also cannot be determined, and there are many more reasons why the number of Jewish victims in the Second World War cannot be fixed. The process of mystification begins in Genesis and continues through the Torah (the seventy people taken by Jacob to Egypt, for instance, apparently increased to two or three million within 150 years). At all periods large, and sometimes huge variations occur in the "estimates", and only estimates are possible, as the present term, "Jew", is legally indefinable and statistically elusive.
An eminent Jewish authority, Dr. Hans Kohn, in his article on "the distribution of Jews" in the Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year for 1942, writes:
"In view of the fact that in several of the countries where the largest number of Jews were living in 1941 the census did not contain any questions regarding religion ... the exact number of Jews in the world in 1941 could not be ascertained. The definition of persons falling under the classification of 'Jewish race' is in no way agreed upon ... In countries where the census included questions of religious origins, even this religious criterion of Jewish faith is difficult to define exactly. Thus the assumption which generally varied around the figure of 16 million" (for the entire world) "cannot claim any foundation on exact 'figures. To this uncertainty about the number of Jews in the world was added in recent years a growing uncertainty about their numerical distribution in the different countries and continents. Probably more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and the U.S.S.R."
A weaker basis than that even for "estimates" (not to speak of "statistics") can hardly be imagined, yet in the ensuing period, when all the additional confusions of war and occupation were piled on this infirm foundation, precise numbers of Jewish casualties were produced day by day, circulated by thousands of assiduous propagandists, and at the end dec1ared to amount to six millions!
Dr. Kohn says that "probably" more than 6,000,000 Jews lived in Poland and U.S.S.R. in 1941. In respect of the U.S.S.R. this might corroborate another Jewish authority (Prof. H.M.T. Loewe), who said in the Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 that 2,700,000 Jews then lived there. Similarly, four years earlier (1933) the Jewish journal Opinion had stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was under 3,000,000; and the Soviet official Encyclopaedia in 1953 stated that "the Jewish population of the Soviet Union in 1939 was 3,020,000".
This near agreement among four authorities in respect of the period 1933-1941 might lead the reader to think that the number of Jews in one country at least (the U.S.S.R.) was established with reasonable accuracy at a given time. On the contrary, this is a statistical jungle where nothing is ever established. In 1943 the Jewish Commissar Mikhoels said in London (according to the Johannesburg Jewish Times of 1952), "Today we have in the Soviet Union 5,000,000 Jews". That is two million more than two years before, and if it was true presumably meant that most of the Jews in Poland, after Hitler and Stalin fell out, moved into Soviet territory. However, in the same issue of the Jewish Times a leading Jewish writer, Mr. Joseph Leftwich, stated that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. in 1952 was 2,500;000, "a loss since 1943 of 2,500,000". He asked, "where and how did they disappear?"; the answer, in my judgment, is that most of them disappeared into the statistics.
That is not the end of the confusion in this one section of the question. The Encyclopaedia Britannica of 1937 (in giving the above-cited figure of 2,700,000 Jews in Russia on Jewish authority) said they formed about six percent of the total population. The total population was elsewhere given in the same encyc1opaedia as 145,000,000 and six percent of that would be 8,700,000!
The encyc1opaedias, statistical yearbooks and almanacs are in this one question all at odds with each other and untrustworthy. I could multiply examples (for instance, the Jewish World Congress in 1953 announced that the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 1,500,000) but wandering in a maze without an outlet is profitless. All published figures are "estimates" made at the estimators' pleasure, and are without value. A professional accountant might write a book on the efforts of the encyc1opaedists to make the post-war figure of Jewish population in the world conform with the pre-war "estimates", minus six million. Figures are tricky things: a few examples:
The leading American reference yearbook, the World Almanac, in 1947 gave the 1939 Jewish world-population as 15,688,259. In later editions up to 1952 it increased this prewar estimate (without explanation) by a million, to 16,643,120. It gave the 1950 population as 11,940,000, which, if subtracted from the first figure given for 1939, gives a reduction of nearly four millions (though not of six). However, it based even this "estimate" on another estimate, name1y, that in 1950 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 2,000,000. This still left unanswered Mr. Leftwich's question in respect of Commissar Mikhoels's statement, that in 1943 the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. was 5,000,000.
In England Whitaker's Almanac, of similar eminence, struggled with the same problem. In its 1949 and 1950 issues it gave the 1939 "estimated" Jewish world population as 16,838,000 and that of 1949 as 11,385,200, a reduction of nearly 5,500,000. However, the figures given for Jewish population in separate countries added up to 13,120,000 (not 11,385,200). Incidentally, Whitaker's in 1950 gave the Jewish population of the U.S.S.R. as 5,300,000, against the World Almanac's figure for the same year, of 2,000,000.
Both these publications are of the highest repute for painstaking accuracy and the fault is not theirs; in this one matter alone only Jewish "estimates" are available, and for obvious reasons no dependence can be placed on these. I pointed out the discrepancies in a book of 1951 and observed that Whitaker's in 1952 no longer contained these "estimates of Jewish populations"; apparently it had abandoned the statistical quest as hopeless, and was right to do so. Another encyclopaedia in its 1950 edition also dropped the subject.
Finally, the New York Times, which may be described as the world's leading Jewish newspaper (it is Jewish-owned and New York is today primarily a Jewish city) in 1948 published what claimed to be an authoritative statistical article, computing the Jewish population of the world (three years after the war's end) between 15,700,000 and 18,600,000. If either figure was near truth this meant that the Jewish world-population had remained stationary or increased during the war years.
Newspaper articles are soon forgotten (unless some diligent student preserves them) but the great propagandist fabrications are handed on. Thus the historians, those men of precision in other questions, passed on the legend of "mass-extermination" to posterity. At the war's end Professor Arnold J. Toynbee was producing his monumental Study of History and in its eighth volume (1954) said that "the Nazis . . . reduced the Jewish population of Continental Europe, west of the Soviet Union, from about 6,5 million to about l,5 million by a process of mass-extermination". He called this "a bare statistical statement" and then added a footnote showing that it was not a statistical statement: "it is not possible to give exact figures based on accurate statistics and it seemed improbable in 1952 that the necessary information would ever be obtainable". Professor Toynbee explains that his figure was based on Jewish "calculations, in which there were several possible sources of error". He concludes that "it might be estimated" that five million Continental Jews had been done to death by the Nazis.
The estimate is historically valueless. The starting-point for consideration of this question is the fact that six million Jews, or anything approaching that number, cannot possibly have been "done to death" or caused to "perish", for the reasons given at the start of this discussion; the very assertion, made before the Nuremberg court, was an affront to their 825,000 fighting-men, sailors and civilians, killed in all theatres of war, of which only the Western politicians of this century would have been capable.
The number of Jews who were killed or perished will never be known, for the reasons already stated and partly discovered by Professor Toynbee in his footnote to history. The very term "Jew" is indefinable; Jews are often not isolated in statistics; and at no time can the number of living Jews in the world be ascertained with any approach to accuracy. Indeed, any attempt to reach statistical clarity through census or immigration data is attacked as "discrimination" and "anti-semitism". For instance:
"Immigrants seeking to settle in Australia will from now on not be asked on application forms if they are Jewish, it was made known in Sydney by the executive committee of Australian Jewry, which protested against this practice to the immigration authorities" (the Jewish Times, Johannesburg). In England, "it is impossible, in the absence of official statistics, to do more than make an intelligent guess . . . the exact number of Jews in Britain remains a mystery" (the Zionist Record, Johannesburg). In America, President Roosevelt was brought under unremitting pressure to abolish the requirement to state "Jewish" on immigration forms, and in 1952 a major campaign was waged by the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee against the McCarran-Walter Act because it sought to restore this requirement. This act was in the event passed over President Truman's veto, but even a rigorous application of the reinstated requirement would not lead to clarification, as applicants, if they wish, may insert "British" or any similar description, instead of "Jewish".
This state of statistical affairs is now wellnigh universal, so that the whole question is a mystery and has deliberately been made one. None can even guess the number of Jews whose deaths, during the war, were not natural or the result of bombing and the like, but who were done to death by the Nazis. My opinion is that, whatever was the number of Jews in the countries overrun by Hitler, the number of their victims was in roughly that proportion to the total population stricken, Polish, Czech and other. I have found this to be the opinion of all persons known to me who survived the concentration camps and occupations. Having suffered themselves, their feeling for Jewish victims was as strong as for all others, but they could not understand why the one case of the Jews was singled out and the number of Jewish victims monstrously exaggerated.
The reason, hidden from them, became clear with the hangings on the Jewish Day of Judgment, for this symbolic act set the pattern for the entire conduct of the occupation, on both sides of the line, in its early years, and even for the future conduct of Western foreign policy far outside the bounds of Europe. The Talmudic vengeance was the start of a new era in the history of the West, during which all national considerations were to be subordinated to the cause of Jewish nationhood, as represented by the Talmudists from Russia.
I have a description, from a person who was present, of the manner in which the Nuremberg judgment came to be delivered on September 30 and October l, 1946 (between the Jewish New Year, September 26, and the Jewish Day of Atonement, October 5), and was executed immediately after midnight in the morning of October 16, Hoshana Rabba, the day when the Jewish god, after an interval during which he considers his verdict on every single human being, and may still pardon sinners, delivers his final judgment. This description says, "... all thought the judgment would be delivered sooner than it was, and a number of trifling circumstances delayed it, till the date was fixed somewhere round September 15 ... Then X, one of the member judges, objected to the literary form of part of the judgment... it was roughly ca1culated how long it would take to recast it and to recopy the recasting; and the date was fixed by this".
I have deleted the name of the member judge. As a result of this delay for literary improvement the judgment fell midway through the holiest ten days of the Jewish Year and was executed on the day of Jehovah's vengeance. I had foretold some such denouement, in a book published during the war, after Mr. Anthony Eden, on 17 December 1942 in the House of Commons, had made a "Declaration" about the Jews, in which he implicitly limited to the Jews the threat that "Those responsible for these crimes shall not escape retribution". Mr. Roosevelt, in America, had made a declaration of similar implication.
The Nuremberg trial formed the model for many lesser "war crimes" trials; these have been discussed, from the legal and moral point of view, in the books of Mr. Montgomery Belgion, Mr. F.J.P. Veale and the late Captain Russell Grenfell. A little of the truth about them filtered out in the course of years. In 1949 an American Administration of Justice Review Board, appointed after numerous protests, reported on some of the American military court trials at Dachau, where 297 death sentences had been approved. The report spoke of "mock trials" to which the defendants had been brought hooded, with ropes round their necks, and "tried" before mock-altars with crucifixes and candles; they were subjected to brutal treatment in the effort to extort confessions which then could be produced before the real trial (the prisoners were led to believe that the mock-trial was the genuine one)."
Now, let us not delude ourselves. There certainly were ad hoc mass machine gunnings of Jews by the Nazi Einsatzgruppen (similar to the Mai Lai massacres of Vietnamese perpetrated by Americans): http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/Bruns/index.html
But the magnitude of even these atrocities has been grossly exaggerated, and all these exaggerations have obfuscated the severe nature of Soviet and Allied atrocities. And absurd fabrications have been put forth in this area: http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/child-victims-of-nazis.html
It was admitted as early as 1949, by a British lawyer, that the Nazis own figures of Jews murdered by the Einsatzgruppen were exaggerated by 1000%.
And the Soviets evacuated most of the Jews before the Nazis even got there!:
It is important to note that Hitler said that he would "tackle the Jewish problem" once the war was over (and as the article by Paul Grubach noted, this meant mass deportation): http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/TableTalk240742.html
The Wannsee conference was where Nazi leadership decided what to do about the "Jewish question". as noted, Hitler believed that winning the war was much more important to him than dealing with those matters. His orders quoted by his chief civil servant Dr Hans Lammers, chief of the Reich Chancellery, to Franz Schlegelberger, of the Ministry of Justice, as follows: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Schlegelberger/DocItself0342.html
"Mr Reich Minister Lammers informed me that the Führer had repeatedly declared to him that he wants to hear that the Solution of the Jewish Problem has been postponed until after the war is over. That being so, the current discussions are of purely theoretical value, in Mr Reich Minister Lammers' opinion. He will moreover take pains to ensure that, whatever else happens, no fundamental decisions are taken without his knowledge in consequence of a surprise briefing by any third party."
Irving's overview of the conference provides insight: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Himmler/Wannsee.html
The revisionist scholar Carlo Mattogno, in "Auschwitz: The Case for Sanity", made mention of a very interesting letter: http://archive.org/details/CarloMattognoAuschwitzTheCaseForSanity2010
On January 21, 1943, the SS-Standortarzt (garrison surgeon) of Auschwitz, SSHauptsturmführer Eduard Wirths, wrote a letter to the camp commander [Rudolf Höss]:[Footnote: 105 RGVA (Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennii Vojennii Archiv (Russian national war archives),
Moscow), 502-1-313, p. 57]
“1. The SS garrison surgeon at Auschwitz requests to install a partition in the dissecting hall planned for the new crematorium building at Birkenau, dividing the hall into 2 rooms of equal size and to have 1 or 2 wash basins installed in the first of these rooms, because the latter will be needed as an autopsy room, whereas the 2nd room will be needed for anatomical preparations, for the preservation of files and writing materials and books, for the preparation of colored tissue sections and for work with the microscope.
2. Furthermore it is requested to provide for an ‘undressing room’ [Auskleideraum] in the cellar rooms."
This request was implemented. And it raises an important question - why would Nazis want to keep office equipment in a "gas chamber"?
Mattogno's commentary on this, and the actual nature of the "undressing rooms" (pp. 72-79), is well worth reading. It concludes:
"We now have the answers to the two questions raised in the beginning:
1) The “Auskleideraum” was used for the corpses of the detainees who had died in the camp. At the Belsen trial, SS-Hauptsturmführer Josef Kramer, commander of the Auschwitz camp from May 8, 1944, declared in this respect (Phillips, p. 731):
"Whoever died during the day was put into a special building called the mortuary, and they were carried to the crematorium every evening by lorry. They were loaded on the lorry and off the lorry by prisoners. They were stripped by the prisoners of their clothes in the crematorium before being cremated."
2) Initially a barrack set up in front of the crematorium was used as "Auskleideraum," because “Leichenkeller 2” was not yet operational on
January 21, 1943, the day SS garrison surgeon requested an “Auskleideraum”;
Leichenkeller 1 was available from February 11.
The existence of an undressing room in the crematorium is therefore entirely normal, as results moreover from the assignment of rooms in
crematorium I of the main camp: Laying-out room (Aufbahrungsraum), corpse washing room (Waschraum) and morgue (Leichenhalle). As the corpses were cremated without a coffin, the Aufbahrungsraum was not a “hall for the placement of the corpse on a stretcher” but a room in
which the bodies were undressed before being washed in the room next door and finally placed naked in the morgue."
Most serious Revisionists conclude that somewhere between 69,000 and 150,000 people died at Auschwitz from all causes, mostly disease and starvation brought on by the obliteration of German supply lines in Allied bombing raids. This number is based on the Auschwitz death books released to the Soviet Archives in 1989, the reports of the International Red Cross who inspected the camps, and other evidence: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p265_Weber.html
It has now been acknowledged by one of France's most influential and reputable magazines, L'Express, that the “gas chamber” shown to tourists in Auschwitz I main camp is a fake that was concocted three years after the war by the Communists for propaganda purposes: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p23_Weber.html
(The following two items I have note verified, but include to fuel further research: Auschwitz in fact had a swimming pool (fitted with a diving board), a soccer field, a cinema, a theater, a brothel, hospitals, a post-office, religious facilities, a sauna, an artist’s studio, kitchens, dental facilities, and so on. These are hardly things one would expect to find in a "death camp": http://rense.com/lets_stop_with_the_auschwitz_lies.htm.html
In Auschwitz, there was actually a theater where actor inmates performed skits, plays and organized musical ensembles(!): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeME45M0vW0)
The chemist Germar Rudolf, in an analysis of and report on the alleged gas chamber, noted the following in his conclusion to the report: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/trr/
"-Even according to the statements of pharmacist J.C. Pressac, who, in the late 80s and early 90s, was promoted as THE technical Holocaust expert, eyewitness testimonies relating to the engineering of the installations and their capacity are, almost without exception, untenable. But even the corrections to the testimonies considered by Pressac to be necessary do not go far enough to make them credible. In particular, the testimonies relating to the duration of executions in the 'gas chambers' (morgue 1) of crematoria II and III, as well as the ventilation times after the executions go completely awry. This is because of the over-estimation of the evaporation rate of hydrogen cyanide from the carrier of Zyklon B, as well as the incorrect concept of the effectiveness of the ventilation of the rooms. If the eyewitness testimonies relating to the quantities of Zyklon B used, and at least approximately relating to the rapidity of the execution procedure are to be accepted, then they are incompatible with testimonies, sometimes of the same witnesses, that the victims' corpses were removed from the 'gas chambers' immediately after the executions and without gas masks and protective garments. This is particularly true for those alleged 'gas chambers' without ventilation installations (crematoria IV and V and farmhouses I and II), since working in poorly ventilated 'gas chambers' with high concentrations of poison gas is impossible without gas masks. The extreme danger to the sweating workers of the Sonderkommando, who are supposed to have worked without protective garments, makes the witnesses untrustworthy. The eyewitness accounts are therefore completely contradictory, illogical, contrary to the laws of nature, and therefore incredible. The witnesses engage in particular contortions when it comes to the cremations (amount and kind of fuel used, speed of cremation, development of flames and smoke), which furthermore fail to accord with the analyses of aerial photography.
-The alleged installations for the mass murder of human beings are, in Pressac's judgment, impractical for their purpose, but were, on the contrary, illogically constructed in parts, so that they would not have been suitable as instruments of mass extermination. Once one considers the actual technical requirements, the impression remains of the total inadequacy of the installations in question-which were deficient to the point of uselessness-in gross contradiction to the technically advanced disinfestation chambers in the immediate vicinity. The facts set forth here with relation to Zyklon B introduction pillars in the ceilings of the 'gas chambers' (morgue 1) of crematoria I to III strengthen the suspicion of a subsequent manipulation almost to a certainty. These installations would have been even less suitable than crematoria IV and V. It would have been impossible to introduce the gas into them.
-Due to the proven, enormous environmental resistance of Iron Blue pigment, the slight cyanide traces in alleged homicidal 'gas chambers', which are demonstrable in places, but are not reproducible, cannot be explained on the basis of remaining residues of a disintegration process, since even on the weathered exterior side of the disinfestation wing large quantities of cyanide can be found even today. Towards the end of the operating period of the installations, therefore, the cyanide content must have been present in the same order of magnitude as it is today, as well as in the areas which were never exposed to weathering. But the cyanide values of protected areas in the alleged homicidal 'gas chambers' are just as low as in places exposed to weathering. Weathering has, therefore, not actually diminished these slight traces. The low cyanide values cannot be explained by fumigation of the premises for vermin, as postulated by Leuchter, since such fumigation would probably have left greater quantities of cyanide in the moist cellars of crematoria II and III. The cyanide values of the alleged homicidal 'gas chambers' lie in the same order of magnitude as the results, among others, of the samples taken by myself from parts of other buildings (hot air disinfestation Building 5a, inmates barracks, the washroom of crematorium I). These values, however, lie so near the detectable threshold that no clear significance can be attributed to them, most importantly due to their lack of reproducibility. From the above, one can safely conclude that no cyanide residues capable of interpretation can be found in the walls of the alleged homicidal 'gas chambers'.
It was further possible to show that, under the conditions of the mass gassings as reported by eyewitnesses in the alleged 'gas chambers' of crematorium II to V, cyanide residues would have been found in similar quantities, coloring the walls blue, as they can be found in the disinfestation wings of building 5a/b. Since no significant quantities of cyanide were found in the alleged homicidal 'gas chamber', one must conclude that these installations were exposed to similar conditions as the above mentioned other installations (hot air disinfestation, inmate barracks, washroom of crematorium I), i.e., that they most likely were never exposed to any hydrogen cyanide."
Rudolf has of course been libeled, a rebuttal of that libel is here: http://vho.org/GB/c/GR/Green.html
Many people are still hypnotized the "horrific images" they have seen of this event. Many of these photographs were hoaxes, or were a result of Allied/Soviet actions. See, as an introduction to this fact, the following: http://vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcffor.html
Many of these images and much of this footage was produced by the psychological warfare department of the American military, as well as psych-warfare agents in Britain and the Soviet Union, and you can even see, in the background of some of this footage, Billy Wilder, the man who directed Marylin Monroe in "Some Like it Hot", who had an axe to grind with Hitler, since his rise to power was inconvenient for him and he had to leave the country, and who is seen wearing a director's garb of all black and a beret! This, and many other aspects of this psychological warfare operation, are explored in depth in the documentary "Buchenwald: A Dumb, Dumb Portrayal of Evil": http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/Buchenwald/
as noted, the inmates of the German concentration camps lived quite luxurious lives. They were provided with sports stadiums, concerts, gardens, swimming pools, and all manner of other benefits. In contrast, the Soviet GULAG system was utterly brutal. We can see actual primary source footage as a basis for our comparisons here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAL2Zi8V8Wo
A “final solution” of extermination was not proposed by a German Nazi, but rather by an American Jew; and it was not the extermination of Jews which he proposed, but the genocide of German Gentiles. Theodor Newman Kaufman advocated the genocidal sterilization of all Germans as a “final solution” in 1941 in his book “Germany Must Perish!”, before the Wannsee-Konferenz occurred.
Here is a relevant quote from the book:
“A final solution: Let Germany be policed forever by an international armed force? Even if such a huge undertaking were feasible life itself would not have it so. As war begets war, suppression begets rebellion. Undreamed horrors would unfold. Thus we find that there is no middle course; no act of mediation, no compromise to be compounded, no political or economic sharing to be considered. There is, in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from this earth!” (Kaufman, Theodor Newman. Germany Must Perish!, Argyle Press, Newark, New Jersey, (1941), p. 88): http://archive.org/details/GermanyMustPerish_479
The Jewish Communist Ilya Ehrenburg further expressed this anti-German hatred. In one leaflet entitled “Kill,” Ehrenburg incited Russian soldiers to treat the Germans as subhuman. The final paragraph concludes:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … – Kill the Germans! Kill!” (cited in De, Zayas Alfred M. “Nemesis at Potsdam: the Anglo-Americans and the Expulsion of the Germans : Background, Execution, Consequences”. London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1977. p. 66): http://tinyurl.com/3fowj58
On February 29, 1944, a letter from the British Ministry of Information to the BBC and British Clergy noted that the Communists had committed atrocities all over Europe, but to save face, they would fabricate atrocity propaganda to vilify the Germans (http://tinyurl.com/72qxk8d). Subsequently, they would do just that, regurgitating propaganda against Germany that had appeared in other contexts, as false accusations, for years prior to WWII (articles appear in the New York Times going back to 1900 complaining about a “holocaust” of “six million Jews, but perhaps one of the most infamous of these articles came from American Hebrew on October 31, 1919, and was entitled "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!" In the article, it was claimed that during World War One, because of epidemics, starvation and a "holocaust", SIX MILLION Jews succumbed: http://archive.org/details/TheCrucifixionOfTheJewsMustStop). The Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann admitted what a farce the whole affair was when he said in his autobiography that the whole Nuremberg trail had been prepared YEARS in advance in order to secure Palestine for the Zionists: http://ia600403.us.archive.org/2/items/ZionismAndTheWorldWars/NahumGoldmann_JewishParadoxQuote.jpg
Investigation of this dogmatic social religion shows so many holes in it that even its leading adherents will admit this fact. Prussian Jewish historian Samuel Gringauz, Chairman of the Council of the Central Committee Of Liberated Jews In The American Zone of German, wrote in an 1950 issue of Jewish Social Studies about survivor testimonies: http://tinyurl.com/bwe9tw2
"... most of the memoirs and reports are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks and apologies."
Gerald Reitlinger, in "The Final Solution: The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945", noted: http://tinyurl.com/c79rk8e
"A certain degree of reserve is necessary in handling all this material, and particularly this applies to the last section (survivor narratives)... The Eastern European Jew is a natural rhetorician, speaking in flowery similes..."
(On that, I would like to remind the reader of the oath negating Kol nidre "prayer", mentioned at the beginning of this essay. The anti-Zionist Jew Josef Ginsburg, whose father was a Rabbi, testified as a defense witness in the second trial of Ernst Zündel in 1988. In the testimony, he noted that the statements made by purported "holocaust survivors" would go down by 95.5% if they were made to swear a special oath negating the Kol Nidre prayer (see p. 552 of the following):http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/KULA.pdf)
Robert Jan van Pelt, a Jewish Auschwitz expert, author of several books on Auschwitz, and expert witness at the 2000 Irving vs. Lipstadt trial, and who said at the trial: "Auschwitz is like the Holy of Holies. I have prepared for years to go there, and have a fool come in, coming completely unprepared, it is sacrilege, somebody who walks into the Holy of Holies and doesn't give a damn": http://hdot.org/en/trial/transcripts/day09/pages46-50
admitted, regarding Auschwitz, "My first problem was rather straightforward: the evidence for Auschwitz was undoubtedly problematic.": http://tinyurl.com/dyly9kw
And in an interview with the Toronto Star, he admitted, "Ninety-nine per cent of what we know we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove": http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/742965--a-case-for-letting-nature-take-back-auschwitz
In the trial of Ernst Zundel, Doug Christie interrogated Raul Hilberg, one of the high priests of this religion, as follows:
"Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” defence counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination.
“I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied.
“You are (at a loss) because you can’t,” Christie said.”: http://tinyurl.com/82vcgnw
For more, I recommend the documentary “Auschwitz: The Surprising Hidden Truth”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6AbLiVcE34
And another excellent documentary illustrating the absurd fabrications in the testimony of purported "survivors" is "The Last Days of the Big Lie": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7tHB8tD34s
Of course, documentaries can often be limited. When searching for relevant primary and authoritative sources, books can often be better. So supplementing that presentation is Germar Rudolf’s mind blowing text, “Lectures on the Holocaust”: holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf
Interestingly, Rudolf was imprisoned for writing this book. If his arguments were so false, then why would he need to be imprisoned for pushing them?
Unfortunately, Hitler acted against those perpetrators of heinous atrocities (Communism and Zionism), who nevertheless profess to be the only "victims" who have endured suffering in the past one hundred and fifty years. They command the world to weep for them, because they control the world. And they are able to incite in people hatred of those who would dare oppose their power structure.
Now, with all of that said, there is something that cannot be denied, the Nazis did pursue a negative eugenics program that involved compulsory sterilization, which is as abhorrent as the fact that they were an authoritarian collectivist government.
Allen Chase writes,
"When Hitler’s Thousand-Year Reich fell in 1945, it was revealed by the German Central Association of Sterilized Persons that at least two million human beings had had been ruled in the Eugenics Courts to be eugenically unfit (dysgenic) and sterilized against their will during the twelve years of the Nazi version of [Harry H.] Laughlin’s Eugenical Sterilization Law. Under the voluntary sterilization law of the Weimar Republic overthrown by Hitler, between 1927 and 1933 a total of less than 500 Germans—about 85 people a year, most of them women whose health would have been jeopardized by pregnancy—had been voluntarily sterilized. Under the Nazis, an average of 165,000 Germans of both sexes were sterilized annually against their will—at the rate of 450 forced sterilizations per day." (The Legacy of Malthus : The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism (University of Illinois Press, 1980). p. 135): http://tinyurl.com/9z4loj6
This is not killing people, and Hitler's opponents (the Bolsheviks) were far worse, but this again shows the problems of authoritarian collectivist governments, where certain people can considered as "trash" and prevented from reproducing. In the United States, such policies are also pursued, though more subtly. Abortion is a thriving industry nowadays, especially considering it’s intended goal (at least as it culturally promoted now) – to kill black people. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, noted in a December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble that “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” (http://tinyurl.com/6umgmsg) Things have certainly worked out as she intended (http://tinyurl.com/7h8q2qm). It is also obviously considered necessary in our modern economy, since not only are vaccines that cause harm made with aborted fetal tissue (http://tinyurl.com/7rvp4b3), but also, as the Washington Times noted, beauty creams are using this “technology” as well (http://tinyurl.com/6lht7zz), and HEK 293 (Human Embryonic Kidney) cells form the basis of the “flavor enhancing” technology of the biotech company Senomyx (http://tinyurl.com/6ubhpvk – and Senomyx “technology” forms the basis of some of the “flavors” in “food” from Campbell Soup, Nestlé, PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, and Solae). Furthermore, abortion gives the woman who undergoes the process a greater chance of breast cancer (http://tinyurl.com/23rmsqd). It’s a beautiful warfare strategy.
The leaders of these movements have often used Britain and America as proxies. They have subsidized and/or collaborated with the aristocrats of those countries, like Cecil Rhodes, J.P. Morgan, the Rockefellers, etc. This is discussed in my essay on the Rothschilds, and a recent example of such a collaboration is the UNCED 4th World Wilderness conference, which deserves an essay all on its own: http://archive.org/details/GeorgeHuntUncedEarthSummit1992cobdenClubsPapersaldousHuxleythe_125
But this does not mean that they act favorably to Britain and America. The Rothschild essay discuses some of the things they did that taxed Britain. America was certainly taxed by them. For instance, Freedman lightly touched on the opposition John F. Kennedy had to Israel's desire to become a nuclear aggressor. Mr. Kennedy couldn't be allowed to prevent Israel's glorious triumph. So naturally he was taken care of. He pissed of a lot of groups, but there was definitely an Israeli connection.
First, those who support the standard narrative concerning the JFK assassination ought to see the film "Evidence of Revision", which, using relevant primary source footage, completely demolishes that narrative: http://archive.org/details/EvidenceOfRevision-Series
Then, on the subject of the Israeli connection in the attack, Michael Collins Piper provides insight in "Final Judgement": http://www.scribd.com/doc/87393717/Final-Judgment
The standard narrative concerning 9/11 is also another key myth supporting Zionist ambitions. A good introduction to the Zionist role in the attacks is the film "9/11: Missing Links": http://www.911missinglinks.com/
Many people think that Israel didn't do this, given that it is purportedly a "friend" of the United States. In actuality, Israel often will commit extremely violent acts against the United States if it seems to be advantageous. In 1954, Israelis disguised themselves as Muslims and actually committed acts of terrorism against British and U.S. targets. (http://tinyurl.com/26fjqam) One of the more famous incidents was with the U.S.S. Liberty, where Israeli fighter jets and torpedo boats attacked a U.S. ship in order to get us fighting Egypt for them, further progressing the 1967 Israeli-Arab war (http://tinyurl.com/cdb53). They ended up getting away with it, of course, with no repercussions, and we continued to assist them, more than we did before. Greg Felton, in "The Host and the Parasite", established ingeniously how Zionism progressively entrenched itself into American politics, and achieved domination of the American political scene, at previously unprecedented levels, in the 1980s and early 1990s (http://tinyurl.com/63m98k). Throughout this time, these people continued to pursue the "Greater Israel Ambition" (while not being too public about it), focusing on balkanizing Arab neighbors in a strategy outlined by geopolitical thinker Oded Yinon (http://tinyurl.com/dzyma6).
The Iraq war was planned first by a Zionist/neo-conservative think tank in a document entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” (http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm). It was a Zionist imperative to remove Saddam Hussein from power back in 1994 – in order to facilitate greater imperialistic ambitions. Many of these people would be influential in the Bush Administration, and would write an important policy planning document entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, which set forth essentially the same imperialistic roadmap as the “Clean Break” document did, but added more rhetoric about a “revolution in military affairs” and so forth. This document, among other things, stated (p. 51), “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic catalyzing event — like a New Pearl Harbor.” (http://tinyurl.com/7onk)
A "Revolution in Military Affairs" was referred to in that document. A military future history describing the implementation of the RMA was written in 1994, entitled “The Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA283836
Substitute “Iraq” for “Cuba”, and you have a map of the recent decade, written in 1994.
Excerpts are as follows:
p. 2: “It is ironic that just as Marxism reached final bankruptcy as a framework for political and economic organization, one of its
basic notions gained new life. Karl Marx, after all, postulated that revolutions can be deliberate rather than inadvertent; historical change can be created, engineered, and harnessed by those who understand it.”
The document then covers details of military realities in the modern world, and posits a future history – after describing the fact that wars occur more between networks than between nation states, and positing a series of problems this caused, it says:
p. 19: “This series of fiascos led a small number of American political leaders, senior military officers, and national security experts to conclude that a revolution was needed in the way we approached conflict short of war. They held the Vietnam-inspired doctrine of the 1980s and 1990s directly responsible for these disasters. Only radical innovation, they concluded, could renew U.S. strategy and avoid a slide into global irrelevance.”
pp. 19-20: “The revolutionaries’ first task was to recruit proselytes throughout the government and national security community. Initially the revolutionaries, who called their new strategic concept “Dynamic Defense,” were opposed by isolationists who felt that new technology should be used simply to build an impenetrable electronic and physical barrier around the United States. Eventually the revolutionaries convinced the president-elect following the campaign of 2000 that Dynamic Defense was both feasible and effective–a task made easier by his background as a pioneering entrepreneur in the computer-generated and controlled “perception-molding” systems developed by the advertising industry. The President was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA in conflict short of war.”
p. 20: “The first step in implementing Dynamic Defense was reshaping the national security organization and its underlying attitudes and values. Technology provided opportunity; only intellectual change could consolidate it. With the full and active support of the President, the revolutionaries reorganized the American national security system to make maximum use of emerging technology and new ideas.”
p. 20: “This integrated the military, civilian law enforcement, the diplomatic corps, and organizations responsible for gathering and analyzing intelligence. Since so many of the conflicts faced by the United States were “gray area” threats falling somewhere in between traditional military problems and traditional law enforcement problems, the organizational division between the two was abolished.”
p. 21: “One of the turning points of the revolution came when its leaders convinced the President and key members of Congress that traditional American ethics were a major hindrance to the RMA. This was crucial: the revolutionaries and their allies then crafted the appropriate attitudinal vessel for the RMA. Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic “consciousness-raising,” old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed.
This was relatively easy since frustration with domestic crime had already begun to alter attitudes and values. In fact, the RMA in conflict short of war was, in many ways, a spin-off of the domestic “war on drugs and crime” of the late 1990s when the military… became heavily involved in support to domestic law enforcement. The changes in American values that accompanied that struggle were easily translated to the national security arena. Once the norms concerning personal privacy changed, law soon followed.”
p. 21-22: “Old-fashioned ideas about information control and scientific inquiry also changed. Preventing enemies (or potential enemies) from responding to our technological advantages became a prime objective of U.S. national security strategy.
The government closely controlled and monitored foreign students attending American universities and exchanges of information within the global scientific and business communities. When necessary, the govemment protected valuable information through outright deception. And the national security community cooperated closely with business on counterespionage, providing training, advice, and equipment. With values changed, technology then opened the door to profound innovation. Vast improvements in surveillance systems and information processing made it possible to monitor a large number of enemies (and potential enemies). In pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic. Cutting-edge pharmaceutical technology also provided tools for national security strategists.”
p. 22: “All of this reorganization and technological development was simply preface for the full flowering of the revolution in military affairs. American leaders popularized a new, more inclusive concept of national security. No distinction–legal or otherwise–was drawn between internal and external threats. In the interdependent 21st century world, such a differentiation was dangerously nostalgic.”
p. 23: “The actual strategy built on the RMA was divided into three tracks. The first sought to perpetuate the revolution. Its internal dimension institutionalized the organizational and attitudinal changes that made the revolution possible, and pursued future breakthroughs in close conjunction with business, the scientific community, and local law enforcement agencies — the core troika of the 21st century security. The external dimension actively sought to delay or prevent counterresponses by controlling information and through well-orchestrated deception.”
p. 23: “The second track consisted of offensive action. Our preference was preemption. In a dangerous world, it was preferable to kill terrorists before they could damage the ecology or strike at the United States… When preemption failed, the United States sought either passive containment where strikes (electronic, psychological, or physical) were used to limit the spread of the deleterious effects of a conflict. For opponents with the ability to harm the United States, the military preemptively destroyed their capabilities.”
p.24: “Probably the finest hour of the new warriors was the Cuba preemption of 2005–Operation Ceberus.”
pp. 24-25: “Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the Comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as “potential” or “active,” with sophisticated computerized personality simulations used to develop, tailor, and focus psychological campaigns for each.”
p. 25: “Individuals and organizations with active predilections to support the insurgency were targets of an elaborate global ruse using computer communications networks and appeals by a computer-generated insurgent leader.”
p. 25: “Psychological operations included traditional propaganda as well as more aggressive steps such as drug assisted subliminal conditioning.”
p. 25: “Since all Americans in Cuba had been bioelectrically tagged and monitored during the initial stages of the conflict, the NEO went smoothly…”
p. 25: “The attitude-shaping campaigns aimed at the American public, the global public, and the Cuban people went quite well, including those parts using computer-generated broadcasts by insurgent leaders–”morphing”– in which they were shown as disoriented and psychotic. Subliminal messages surreptitiously integrated with Cuban television transmissions were also helpful.”
pp. 25-26: “In fact, all of this was so successful that there were only a few instances of covert, stand-off military strikes when insurgent targets arose and government forces seemed on the verge of defeat. U.S. strike forces also attacked neutral targets to support the psychological campaign as computer-generated insurgent leaders claimed credit for the raids. At times, even the raids themselves were computer-invented ‘recreations.’”
pp. 26-27: “Perhaps most important, Americans are beginning to question the economic, human, and ethical costs of our new strategy. A political movement called the “new Humanitarianism” is growing, especially among Americans of Non-European descent, and seems likely to play a major role in the presidential election of 2012. There are even rumblings of discontent within the national security community as the full meaning of the revolution becomes clear. Since the distinction between the military and non-military components of our national security community has eroded, many of those notionally in the military service have come to feel unbound by traditional notions of civil-military relations. This group has founded a new political party – The Eagle Movement – which is beginning to exert great pressure on the traditional political parties for inclusion in national policymaking. The traditional parties are, to put it lightly, intimidated by the Eagle Movement, and seem likely to accept its demands.”
Regarding 9/11 – both Hamid Gul, former head of the ISI, and Andreas von Bulow, who had experience overseeing the German secret service, noted Mossad involvement (http://tinyurl.com/6tb5ufc, http://tinyurl.com/768rnkh). The former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, also noted that it was common knowledge in intelligence agencies around the world that the Mossad orchestrated the 9/11 attacks (http://tinyurl.com/7qkzx9s).
The day before 9/11, the Washington Times noted the results of a recent important Army School of Advanced Military Systems project. The article noted, “Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” (http://tinyurl.com/6rmeycq)
There is the Israeli connection, and there is the fact of Wargames on that day (http://tinyurl.com/y3muh6g), and whistleblowers (http://tinyurl.com/yes4adn), that establishes an altogether different picture of 9/11 than the standard narrative.
There has been a bit of a tendency among some people, especially with a Popular Mechanics piece several years ago, to assume that the standard narrative is solid. The standard narrative is full of holes, and the first step to figuring that out can be to look at how full of holes these low grade “debunking” exercises are. So on the subject of popular mechanics, here are 4 short phone calls that completely discredit it’s presentation on 9/11 (http://tinyurl.com/7z77pko). Here, also, are critiques of claims made by several prominent and semi-prominent “debunkers” over the years (http://tinyurl.com/3v5qxun). It is notable that Popular Mechanics stated in 1993, before all this nonsense they spewed forth, that the World Trade Center was engineered to soak up the impact of a Boeing 707 (http://tinyurl.com/6sujatz).
9/11 provided the impetus of the terrorist combination of U.S., NATO, and Israeli forces to terrorize the Middle East. Ehud Spinzak, an Israeli “counter-terrorism” expert, said, "From the perspective of the Jews, it [9/11] is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favour.": http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/palestinianauthority/1340403/Lost-sympathy-worries-Arafat.html
In an interview with the French daily Le Monde, Ami Ayalon, the former chief of Israel’s internal security service Shabak, or Shin Bet, from 1996-2000, noted that: "Since September 11, our leaders have been euphoric. With no more international pressures on Israel, they think, the way is open.": http://electronicintifada.net/content/unconditional-withdrawal-territories-urgently-needed/3937
The first commentator to bring up the name of Osama Bin Laden as being responsible for 9/11 was Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak on a BBC broadcast shortly after the Twin Towers had collapsed. He also spoke of the next countries to be invaded. See @7:00: http://tinyurl.com/7ngsxao
Here is Gen. Wesley Clark noting the same global war agenda – that among other things the U.S. pledged itself to undermine Lybia far before 2011. He presented this in 2007: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxWtq3rw-fw
In light of this, the following three articles from F. William Engdahl are of relevance: "Egypt's Revolution: Creative Destruction for a 'Greater Middle East'?": http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Creative%20Destruction%20Washington%20Style.pdf
"Creative Destruction Part II: Libya in Washington's Greater Middle East Project": http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Creative%20Destruction%20Part%20II.pdf
"Creative Destruction Part III: Humanitarian Neo-Colonialism: Framing Lybia and Reframing War": http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Creative%20Destruction%20Part%20III.pdf
The actual bin Laden (not the “Wag the dog”, media portrayal of him) comes across very differently than what you’d expect. In a September 28 interview published in the Pakistani newspaper, Ummat, he stated,
"I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States … I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act… The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. … whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. … Daily UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S.is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qaida not targeting their economic pillars? USAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.": http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24697
The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said, "We [Zionists] are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq… [The attacks] swung American public opinion in our favor.": http://www.haaretz.com/news/report-netanyahu-says-9-11-terror-attacks-good-for-israel-1.244044, and who said "America is a thing you can move very easily": http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/16/netanyahu-in-2001-america_n_649427.html, also was the architect of the "war on terror". In fact, he coined the term and developed the basic tenets of the operation: http://www.truth-and-justice.info/origwat.html
He used this term in the 2001 update of his 1995 book, "Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists", and also advocated aggressive action against Iraq and Iran because of the alleged "nuclear threat" they posed (of course, Israel is a nuclear threat, remember the citation of prof. Martin Van Creveld and also see the following: http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/10/dayintech_1005, the story of Iraq having "Weapons of Mass Destruction" was a fabrication: http://downingstreetmemo.com/, and stories about Iran being a "nuclear threat" are likewise fabrications: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28524, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28561, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31541). In that book, Netanyahu said:
"In this case, we might face not thousands of dead, but hundreds of thousands, and possibly millions. This is why the United States must do everything in its power to prevent regimes like Iran and Iraq from developing nuclear weapons, and to neutralize their use of other weapons of mass destruction.
This is the great mission that now stands before the free world. That mission must not be watered down to allow certain states to participate in the coalition that is now being organized. Rather, the coalition must be built around this mission.
It may be that some will shy away from adopting such an uncompromising stance against terrorism. If some free states choose to remain on the sidelines, America must be prepared to march forward without them — for there is no substitute for moral and strategic clarity. I believe that if the United States stands on principle, all the democracies will eventually join the war on terrorism. The easy route may be tempting, but it will not win the day.
On September 11, I, like everyone else, was glued to the television set watching the savagery that struck America. Yet amid the smoking ruins of the Twin Towers one could make out the statue of Liberty holding high the torch of freedom. It is freedom’s flame that the terrorists sought to extinguish. But it is that same torch, so proudly held by the United States, that can lead the free world to crush the forces of terror and secure our tomorrow.": http://tinyurl.com/c26z4rh
I recommend "Zioncrimefactory"'s article on 9/11 for more information, including how the purported global role of the "al-Qaeda" organization is a Mossad scripted fantasy: http://archive.org/details/MastersOfDeception
, but I would also like to point out that the London Telegraph indirectly admitted that the Mossad fabricated the purported "Iraq-al-Qaeda connection", stating, 'The Telegraph has learnt that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation.
They had no specific information about what was being planned but linked the plot to Osama bin Laden and told the Americans that there were strong grounds for suspecting Iraqi involvement,' said a senior Israeli security official.": http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1340698/Israeli-security-issued-urgent-warning-to-CIA-of-large-scale-terror-attacks.html
Of course, as FBI files and other documentation shows, it was Israel that was operating a de-facto terrorist cell within the United States at the time: http://mybigfatanti-zionistlife.blogspot.com/2011/08/official-2001-fbi-docs-on-urban-moving.html
Netanyahu's romances about invading Iraq unfortunately produced very real consequences. The invasion not only killed over 1 million civilians: http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/, but also, gene pools are permanently contaminated due to depleted Uranium exposure that stems from these wars. Just a small sample of the fallout can be seen here: http://www.aztlan.net/du_deformed_iraqi_babies.htm
All of these war efforts, the ambitions outlined in these military strategy documents, etc., are part of a larger overall agenda, revealed by the military document Joint Vision 2020, of "full spectrum dominance": www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/jfq_pubs/1225.pdf
American Imperialism is a major feature in the current system, whether it be financial imperialism assaulting third world countries (http://tinyurl.com/6wlqzy4), or military imperialism according to pre-planned agendas, like Zionism and Globalism. But remember, this is only an intermediate process. To understand how this is the case, we need only to look at one powerful political mind – Zbigniew Brzezinski. At one level, he wrote in “The Grand Chessboard” about how Eurasian powers had to be marginalized. On another level, he wrote about how the U.S. war machine will force the process of Globalism on defiant nations in order to standardize them into the Global system, that simultaneously the U.S. and other Western Powers would be submerged in a Web of International arrangements that would form the fetus of a World Government (happening now), and that ultimately the American Empire would pave the way for a revivified UN with teeth to take charge.
Hopefully, after reading this far, nobody is still naive enough to believe that presidents are anything other than puppets. Still, fo those who maintain their investment in the political circus, it is important to point out that Barack Obama is a far greater warmonger than Bush, and is doing everything he can to further this agenda: http://www.stopwar.org.uk/index.php/usa-war-on-terror/1463-george-w-bush-on-steroids-barack-obama-is-the-cruellest-political-hoax-of-our-times
And woe to the soldiers who are duped into serving these imperialistic agendas, acting as cannon fodder. They are thought of as cannon fodder, by the way. Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein noted in "The Final Days" (p. 208) the following:
"In Haig's presence, Kissinger referred pointedly to military men as 'dumb, stupid animals to be used' as pawns for foreign policy."
The highly decorated general, Smedley Butler, noted how he was doing the bidding of exploitative psychopaths in his book "War is a Racket": http://www.amazon.com/War-Racket-Antiwar-Americas-Decorated/dp/0922915865
and these people really are psychopathic. Here we can see Madeline Albright saying that although half a million Iraqi children died from the first gulf war, it was still worth it to attack the country: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG66QFnufIQ
And in that war, news broadcasts were actually staged, similar to the film "Wag the dog": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTWY14eyMFg
This war was another hoax, to fulfill psychopathic grandiose ambitions: http://www.prwatch.org/books/tsigfy10.html/
People who enter into the military nowadays endure extremely brutal conditions. 18 veterans commit suicide every day because of this: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/us/recent-california-suicides-highlight-failures-of-veterans-support-system.html?pagewanted=all
According to the USA Today, Veterans make up 25% of the homeless population: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-11-07-homeless-veterans_N.htm
Ans since 2001, American soldiers have been pressured and manipulated into signing a 'personality disorder' discharge when they were injured in combat. Sg. Chuck Luther detailed the gruesome facts of this: http://democrats.veterans.house.gov/hearings/Testimony.aspx?TID=73146&Newsid=622&Name=%20Sergeant%20Chuck%20%20Luther
"I was assaulted, held down, and had my pants ripped off my left thigh and given an injection of something that put me to sleep. When I awoke, I was strapped down to a combat litter and had a black eye and cuts on my wrists from the zip ties. I eventually was untied and from that point forward for 5 weeks I was held in a room that was 6 feet by 8 feet that had bed pans, old blankets and other old supplies. I had to sleep on a combat litter and had a wool blanket. I was under guard 24/7 and on several occasions was told I was not allowed to use the phone or internet, and when I would take my meds and fall asleep I was not awakened to get food. On one occasion, I had slept through chow and asked to be taken to the chow hall or PX to get some food. I was told no and given a fuel soaked MRE to eat. I was constantly called a piece of crap, a faker, and other derogatory things. They kept the lights on and played all sorts of music from rap to heavy metal very loud all night, the medics worked in shifts, therefore, they didn’t sleep; they rotated. These are some of the same tactics that we would use on insurgents that we captured to break them to get information or confessions. I went through this for 4 weeks and the HHC Commander, CPT Wehri told me to sign this discharge and that if I didn’t that they would keep me there for 6 more months and then kick me out when we got back to Fort Hood anyway, I said I didn’t have a personality disorder and he told me that if I signed the paperwork that I would get back home and get help and I would have all my benefits. After the endless nights of sleep deprivation, harassment and abuse I finally signed just to get out of there. I was broken."
As these maniacs strive for "full spectrum dominance" abroad, they are increasing the pressure of the boot on the face of the populace at home. While normally I in no way recommend Alex Jones, in this case I make an exception, as he provides a very good inroduction to this subject: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klqv9t1zVww
These trends are increasing world wide. The EU recently announced plans to install a surveillance system to monitor "abnormal behavior" among the populace: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28075219/Police-State-Europe
It has been admitted on the Senate Floor that the NDAA allows anybody in America as well as abroad to be declared an enemy combatant, overturning the constitution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxSVt1R4Iws
There has of course been a cover up of this fact. for information on the myths surrounding the NDAA, see the following: http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_about_the_detention_bill/
And the US army now has re-education camps: http://www.infowars.com/yes-the-re-education-camp-manual-does-apply-domestically-to-u-s-citizens/
For updates on these trends, the following is useful: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=theme&themeId=7
I would also like to discuss Pearl Harbor, because it provides an excellent perspective, given that the neoconservative (ex-Trotskyite, pro-Zionist) planners of 9/11 called it a "New Pearl Harbor". Contrary to mainstream thought today, there was very significant Soviet Influence in the American government in the 1940s. The VENONA documents and other disclosures show that the FDR administration was permeated with Soviet spies. These, along with Anglophile internationalists, were the deciding influences in getting the United States into WWII. First, as for the Anglophile internationalists, Thomas E. Mahl establishes in “Desperate Deception: British Convert Operations in the United States, 1939-1944″ (http://tinyurl.com/75xadct), that William Stephenson (“Intrepid”) and a few hundred other British intelligence agents infiltrated the United states in order to bring the United States into WWII. And in this scheme, Lord Victor Rothschild, a confidant of Churchill, would act as a key Soviet agent (http://mailstar.net/perry.html), relaying all the intelligence information Churchill found out to Stalin. Of course, in addition to Communism and British operations, Zionism was the other major force leading to the U.S. involvement in WWII, as I have noted before.
Jarrold and Leona Schecter established in “Sacred Secrets” (http://tinyurl.com/7qzqnlj) that Harry Dexter White, a very influential Soviet Agent, would also be a key agent of influence in getting the U.S. into the war. White, on direct orders from Stalin, authored 8 of 10 points in the Hull Memorandum which provoked war with Japan. We know now from the McCollum Memorandum, first brought to public attention by Stinnet in his authoritative book on the subject, “Day of Deceit”, that FDR provoked the Japanese. The McCollum Memorandum explicitly calls for Japan to be provoked into committing an “overt act of war” and describes how that might be done: http://rationalrevolution.net/war/fdr_provoked_the_japanese_attack.htm
Historian Harry Elmer Barnes and his colleagues, after the war, wrote the revisionist classic, “Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace”. In Ch. 7 of that book, “The Pearl Harbor Investigations”, Percy L. Greaves, Jr. noted (p. 645), “The APHB top-secret report concluded with this paragraph: Up to the morning of December 7, 1941, everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States…”: http://tinyurl.com/6f4ekas
The notable historian Charles Beard quoted Henry Stimson’s diary in “President Roosevelt and the coming of the war, 1941: appearances and realities” (p. 517), as saying “The question was how we should maneuver them [the Japanese] into firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves.”: http://tinyurl.com/67szowe
The geopolitical background to all of this is provided by historian Charles Callan Tansill in his book “Back Door to War” (1952): http://mises.org/books/backdoor.pdf
Stalin of course was not threatened by the Japanese, which would be dealt with by the U.S., so he unleashed his fury on Central Europe (http://tinyurl.com/74ukgkb).
And as for the subsequent war with Germany that followed, historian Thomas Fleming, in “The New Dealers War” (http://tinyurl.com/8y8ujhp), noted that FDR had written plans to invade Europe by 1943 that were leaked just before Pearl Harbor, and that this was what contributed to Germany’s declaration of war on the United States.
The Schecters also verified the claim, put forth by Elizabeth Bentley and Maj. George Racey Jordan and others, that Harry Dexter White provided stolen U.S. treasury plates to the Soviets, which they subsequently used to used to print extremely high quantities of occupation currency in the eastern zone of postwar Germany, sparking a black market and serious inflation throughout the occupied country. The Schecters noted that this was just “another thread in the tapestry of service [White] wove on behalf of the Soviets.”
Alger Hiss, another instrumental Soviet agent, would be an instrumental figure in the Yalta decisions (http://tinyurl.com/7qgl4jf), which included giving Stalin vast amounts of Europe, greatly expanding the power of the Soviet Empire, and which also led to Operation Keelhaul, which forced the repatriation of two million Soviet refugees for either slave labor or death in the vast Soviet GULAG system. He also founded the United Nations (http://tinyurl.com/6ropn2y), becoming it’s first Secretary General, assisting the Globalist intentions of families like the Rockefellers (http://tinyurl.com/7xfvx4j). The UN would subsequently become a hotbed of Soviet activity (http://tinyurl.com/7odvbsq).
The IPR and Owen Lattimore, on behalf of the Rockefeller Foundation, would play a decisive role in the Communist victory there.
The Tydings Committee was a smear job against McCarthy, and dismissed his concerns over Lattimore. The McCarran Committee, was set up after that, because people were aware that Tydings Committee dismissals were based on insufficient evidence. This Committee, which investigated the Institute of Pacific Relations, showed in great detail in it’s Report how the IPR subverted policy. Se pp. 204-205:
“This section will relate how IPR people in and out of Government were instrumental in keeping United States policy on a course that was anti-Chiang and often pro-Communist in orientation. …
At the end of 1945 when General Marshall left for China, the balance of power was with the Chinese Nationalists … and remained so until at least June 1946. … Chiang’s divisions were chasing the Communists northward and the prospect of victory by Nationalist China was at its highest. … However, when General Marshall arrived in China, he undertook to bring about the coalition government which his directive demanded. … This plan failed when coalition failed. …
When the Chinese government did not effect coalition, by the summer of 1946 United States military assistance to China was brought to an end. Not only did the United States stop sending military supplies to the Chinese Government; the shipment of war materials actually purchased by the Chinese also was halted. … The Chinese also had purchased surplus equipment that remained on Okinawa and other Pacific islands. Even the shipment of this was banned. … A complete
embargo took effect in the summer of 1946. It was maintained at least until May 1947.
General Chennault testified that the first shipment arrived in Shanghai in December 1948. … Chennault further stated that the war material sent to China after the embargo did not arrive in time to aid the Chinese Nationalists in the field. … Admiral Cooke … testified that the Chinese had a number of divisions equipped with American arms. …
When the flow of American ammunition was stopped, these divisions lost their fire power and were defeated. Even after the Eightieth Congress appropriated $125,000,000 for aid to the Chinese, shipments were delayed and when the guns finally reached the Chinese general in north China they were without bolts and therefore useless.”
The full details concerning this and connections to the IPR, Lattimore, etc., are given in the Report. See p. 208 ff., as well as information given before the citation I provided: http://www.archive.org/details/instituteofpacif1952unit
Why might this bizarre situation have occurred? In “The Daily Compass” (NY), Sunday, July 17, 1949, in an article entitled “SOUTH KOREA – ANOTHER CHINA”, Owen Lattimore revealed his intentions and objectives – “The problem was how to allow them [China] to fall without making it look as if the United States had pushed them.” He then stated, “The thing to do, therefore, is to let South Korea fall-but not to let it look as though we pushed it.” (this was before the Korean war – hence we can ): http://www.dcdave.com/article5/110602.htm
Conservapedia (which I normally don’t recommend), nevertheless has an article on Lattimore that is very well documented: http://www.conservapedia.com/Owen_Lattimore
Significantly, as the article notes (and this relates to the Pearl Harbor topic),
“On November 25, 1941, twelve days before Pearl Harbor, Lattimore dispatched an anxious cable to Currie in the White House arguing against a proposed diplomatic understanding between the United States and Japan. When Congress later investigated the Pearl Harbor attack, U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull testified that he took a tough line with the Japanese because of this cable from Lattimore to Currie reporting on Chinese morale in the Kuomintang. This cable was the only documentary evidence Hull presented which influenced his decision to reverse himself and send the ultimatum to Japan. The use of harsh, demanding language toward Japan only strengthened the position of the war party in Tokyo. Japanese Ambassador Nomura found it impossible to reach an agreement because the U.S. demands were extreme.
Prof. Anthony Kubek has written that Lattimore, by this one act, designed to accomplish the Soviet objective of promoting war between the United States and Japan – did more to promote the Sovietization of China than in any other act of his career. All Comintern designs for conquest of China hinged upon destroying Japan and the balance of power in the Pacific. ”
It also notes:
“Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for Haakon Chevalier to KGB operative, Lauchlin Currie. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service (KGB) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to Chiang Kai-shek. Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore’s role in the publication by Amerasia magazine of secret State Department documents. In December 1952, Lattimore was indicted for perjury.”
The rest of the article should be read, as it establishes the extent of Lattimore’s propaganda, and how he, among other things, completely whitewashed the Soviet Gulags.
The McCarran Committee Report stated emphatically (p. 214 of the document, 222 of the pdf) “OWEN LATTIMORE WAS FROM SOME TIME IN THE MIDDLE 1930′S A CONSCIOUS, ARTICULATE INSTRUMENT OF THE SOVIET CONSPIRACY” (emphasis in original)
The full story on Lattimore is presented by journalist John T. Flynn in “While You Slept: Our Tragedy in Asia and Who Made It” (http://www.mises.org/books/whileyouslept.pdf), and “The Lattimore Story” (http://tinyurl.com/87ljrga).
Here’s where things get interesting – the McCarran Committee Report noted (p. 3) that the Institute of Pacific Relations received “generous support from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corp.” – that of the total funding for the organization from 1925-1950, “48 percent came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corp.”
This was one of the contributing factors in the development of the Cox Committee (See Cox Committee transcripts here: http://tinyurl.com/8a5v769). Budenz, who had testified about Lattimore, gave some very important testimony in the Cox Committee. And of course the Cox Committee eventually evolved into the Reece Committee (see Reece Committee transcripts here: http://tinyurl.com/6lpg9jc).
Carroll Quigley, a historian of international financial groups that set up various “power structures” to influence governments, noted the following in his macro-history text “Tragedy & Hope”, when discussing the Reece Committee (pp. 954-955): “It was this group of people, whose wealth and influence so exceeded their experience and understanding, who provided much of the framework of influence which the Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers took over in the United States in the 1930s. It must be recognized that the power of these energetic Left wingers exercised was never their own power or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie, and, once the anger and suspicions of the American people were aroused as they were in the 1950s, it was a fairly simple matter to get rid of the Red sympathizers. Before this could be done, however, a congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from the admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. The Eighty-third Congress set up in 1953 a Special Reece Committee to investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations. It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any revelations to make the publicity worthwhile. An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece Committee’s general counsel, Rene A Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called 'Foundations: Their Power and Influence.'"
Reece Committee research director Norman Dodd, in his investigations, encountered the Ford Foundation chieftain Rowan Gaither, who told him, off the record, “Mr. Dodd, we are here operate in response to similar directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.” (http://tinyurl.com/abxywc)
And significantly, David Rockefeller would state in The New York Times, August 10, 1973, in an article entitled “From a China Traveller” , which praised of Mao’s regime, just after a massive period of death: “One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony… There is a very real and pervasive dedication to Chairman Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive… The enormous social advances of China have benefitted greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose… The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in history.”: http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10D12FA355B1B778DDDA90994D0405B838BF1D3
Then, in the 1970s, David Rockefeller, as admitted in his memoirs, was actually responsible for building up China into the superpower that it is today: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24018026/China-Chase-and-Rockefeller
With all that in mind, I suggest the reader refer back to the relevant citations in Douglas Reed's text "Far and Wide" for an understanding of the broader agenda.
On the subject of Communism in America, it is important to note that Richard Nixon, who presided over the prosecution of Alger Hiss, revealed that with the exception of Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss, the communist agents operating in the United States were almost all Jewish:
"The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. ...Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us." (Statement of President Richard Nixon in 1971, as recorded at the White House on tape and released by the National Archives in 1999 - as cited in the New York Times, Oct. 7, 1999): http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/07/us/in-1971-tapes-nixon-is-heard-blaming-jews-for-communist-plots.html
The ex-Communist Louis Budenz likewise noted the following of his superior J. Peters (Goldberger), who was a member of Bela Kun's regime in Hungary, "As a matter of fact, it was Peters who introduced me to the idea of the conspiratorial apparatus of the Communist Party. ... He told me that the Communist Party is like a submerged submarine: the part you see above water is the periscope, but the part underneath is the real Communist organization; that is the conspiratorial apparatus.": http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/hidden-masters-of-communism.html
For insight into the conspiratorial apparatus, I recommend again that the reader read "Red Symphony".
Jonathan Price -
Subject: Only LIARS and IGNORANT people call the Protocols a "forgery"
Some anti-gentile or Jew-loving philo-semite named phred09 said:
"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an antisemitic hoax."
Your Jewish holocaust is an anti-gentile "hoax."
"It's a complete fraud."
Yes, the alleged "extermination" of six-million Jews most certainly is.
"I urge readers to do their own research on this topic."
Yes, "do your own research" and don't pay attention to comments made by detractors like this ignoramus who most likely never, ever read the Protocols and is just parroting what the Jewish-owned mass media says about this so-called "forgery," or is a Jew himself, a hasbaRat assigned to surfing the net searching for material that sheds light on the crimes and treachery of his domineering tribe.
Yes, "do your own research" IF you have an open mind, IF you are intellectually honest, then by all means watch and download this material, and after having done so, odds are you will conclude that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is NOT a "forgery." NO ONE CAN INVENT SOMETHING LIKE THIS OUT OF THIN AIR! The Protocols makes Nostradamus' predictions look lame in comparison!
"It's unfortunate that this is being spread around yet again."
What is "unfortunate" are liars and obfuscators like the above turd that are floating around fouling things up with their lies and ignorance, hoping someone will believe their crap and not look into a taboo subject because of its alleged 'forged' and so-called "antisemitic" nature. Well, listen here, scumbag, and everyone else like you: I'VE NEVER, EVER READ OR HEARD ANYTHING WRITTEN OR UTTERED BY A SO-CALLED ANTI-SEMITE THAT WASN'T TRUE! Conversely, Jews constantly lie to us! When somebody calls someone or something anti-semitic, I head right towards that person or information, anxious to know what they're saying!
In an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the "Protocols of Zion" tersely and convincingly. He said:
"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going
on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They
fit it now."
The Protocols are now one-hundred seven years old and have continued to fit the world situation up to this time. Those who call it a "forgery" or "antisemitic hoax" are a) a liar, b) never read the book and extremely IGNORANT, or c) both.
P.S. Thank you, blissentia, for all the time and effort you put into writing the (above and below) scholarly essay. I envy your intellectual prowess. I am saving this entire web page for further study and to use as a reference source in the future. All the best.
Subject: Do your research
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an antisemitic hoax. It's a complete fraud. I urge readers to do their own research on this topic. It's unfortunate that this is being spread around yet again.
|Ocr:||ABBYY FineReader 8.0|